State v. Niswonger, 50887

Decision Date18 November 1986
Docket NumberNo. 50887,50887
Citation721 S.W.2d 207
PartiesSTATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Gary NISWONGER, Appellant.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Bradford Kessler, St. Louis, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Carrie Francke, John Munson Morris, Asst. Attys. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

CRIST, Judge.

Appeal from a jury conviction of attempted escape from confinement. Defendant was sentenced by the court to a term of five years' imprisonment, to be served consecutively to a pre-existing twenty-year sentence. We affirm.

The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged. Following his sentencing to fifteen years' imprisonment on three counts of robbery, defendant was being led back to the holding area in the St. Louis County Courthouse. As they passed a fire exit, which appears to have been the last access to the street level between defendant and the holding area, defendant began to hyperventilate. He then struck out at the escorting corrections officer with a weapon consisting of a bar of soap placed inside a pair of socks, one of which had been stuffed inside the other. The officer tackled defendant and held him until help arrived and defendant was secured.

Defendant testified he was angry and frustrated due to his sentencing, the prospect of receiving a longer sentence in a cause proceeding in the City of St. Louis, a possible divorce, and also due to the effects of some pain medication. He had forgotten about "soap and sock" arrangement, which he carried for self-protection in jail, until he was being transported to court. He did not turn it in at that point of time for fear of a contraband charge. While going back to the holding area after sentencing, he got so frustrated he hyperventilated and just swung and unfortunately hit a corrections officer. He denied any intent to escape.

Defendant asserts the court erred in refusing to submit instructions to the jury on third degree assault, claiming third degree assault was a lesser included offense of attempted escape. We disagree. One offense is a lesser included offense of another if the greater offense includes all the legal and factual elements of the lesser. If there is an element of the "lesser" offense not present in the "greater," the "lesser" is not included in the "greater." State v. Cavitt, 703 S.W.2d 92, 93 (Mo.App.1985). Attention is focused upon the statutory elements of each offense, rather than the evidence presented in the individual case. State v. Gobble, 675 S.W.2d 944, 948 (Mo.App.1984).

As relevant herein, assault in the third degree requires an attempt to cause, or reckless infliction of, physical injuries to another person, or knowingly causing physical contact with another...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • State v. Parker
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • September 1, 1987
    ...is focused upon the statutory elements of each offense, rather than the evidence presented in the individual case." State v. Niswonger, 721 S.W.2d 207, 208 (Mo.App.1986). The fact that the evidence establishes guilt of another crime does not necessarily mean that such other crime is a lesse......
  • State v. Reyes
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • September 10, 1993
    ...issue and was considered at length. It has been assumed that § 564.011 defines attempt as used in such statutes. State v. Niswonger, 721 S.W.2d 207 (Mo.App.1986); In re J -- R -- N --, 687 S.W.2d 655 (Mo.App.1985). The facts of this case require detailed consideration of this Section 564.01......
  • State v. Sandusky, 53920
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • November 1, 1988
    ...contains an element not present in the greater, that offense is not a lesser included offense of the greater. State v. Niswonger, 721 S.W.2d 207, 208[1, 2] (Mo.App.1986). Therefore, since the offense of carrying a weapon while intoxicated is not a lesser included offense of unlawful use of ......
  • State v. Shipley, s. 65605
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • April 9, 1996
    ...MAI-CR 3d 323.02, first degree robbery. Thus, stealing by deceit is not a lesser included offense of robbery. See, State v. Niswonger, 721 S.W.2d 207, 208 (Mo.App.E.D.1986), citing State v. Cavitt, 703 S.W.2d 92, 93 (Mo.App.E.D.1985) ("If there is an element of the 'lesser' offense not pres......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT