State v. Nix

Decision Date10 February 1910
Citation51 So. 754,165 Ala. 126
PartiesSTATE v. NIX.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Appeal from Circuit Court, Barbour County; A. A. Evans, Judge.

Jim Nix was charged with enticing a servant.From a judgment sustaining a demurrer to the indictment, the State appeals.Reversed and remanded.

The indictment was in the following language: "The grand jury of said county charge that before the finding of this indictment that Jim Nix knowingly interfered with, hired engaged, enticed away, or induced Jack Massey, a laborer or servant, renter, or share cropper, who had stipulated or contracted in writing to serve one H. J. Turner, a given number of days, weeks, months, or for one year, before the expiration of the term stipulated or contracted for, said contract being in force and binding upon the parties thereto without the consent of the said H. J. Turner, to whom the service was due, given in writing, or in the presence of some reliable person, against the peace and dignity of the state of Alabama."The demurrer takes the points (1) that it charges no offense known to the law; (2) that the act and the section of the Code are unconstitutional and void, as in violation of section 1, art. 1, of the Constitution of the state of Alabama of 1901, and of the Constitution of the United States (fourteenth amendment).There are other grounds not necessary to be set out.

Alexander M. Garber, Atty. Gen., and Thomas W. Martin, Asst. Atty Gen., for the State.

Peach &amp Thomas, for appellee.

McCLELLAN J.

This appeal is by the state of Alabama from a judgment based upon the adjudication of the constitutional invalidity of Code 1907, § 6850.As presently important, the statute reads: "Enticing Away Servants, Renters, or Laborers under Written Contract, etc.--Any person who knowingly interferes with, hires, employs, entices away, or induces to leave the service of another, or attempts to hire, employ, entice away, or induce to leave the service of another, any laborer or servant, renter, or share cropper, who has contracted in writing to serve such other person for any given time, not to exceed one year before the expiration of the time so contracted for. * * *"

The indictment pursues the form provided.Criminal Code 1907, p 669, form 55.Alternative averments in an indictment must each present an indictable offense; and if, in such an indictment, one or more of the alternatives expressed charge no offense, then the indictment is bad in toto.Horton v. State,53 Ala. 493;Hornsby v. State,94 Ala. 55, 10 So. 522;Raisler v. State,55 Ala. 64--among...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
11 cases
  • State v. Hurdle
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • Abril 09, 1917
    ...394, 36 S.Ct. 143, 60 L.Ed. 348; 18 Amer. & Eng. Encl. of Law, 739; Lakeview v. Rose Hill Cemetery Co., 70 Ill. 191, 22 Am. Rep. 71; State v. Aye, 63 S.C. 458, 41 S.E. 519; Tarpley v. State, 79 Ala. 271; Lee v. State, 75 Ala. 29; State v. Nix, 165 Ala. 126, 51 So. 754; State v. Harwood, 104 N.C. 724, 10 171; Kline v. Eubanks, 109 La. 241, 33 So. 211; Petty v. Leggett, 38 So. 549. There is a clear difference between section 1146 and section 1147 of the Code of 1906. This court, in State...
  • Du Bose v. City of Montgomery
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • Marzo 07, 1961
    ...is charged disjunctively and any one of the alternatives or (as here) 'tri-ternatives' fails to state an offense, then against demurrer the defect will render the whole bad. State v. Collins, 200 Ala. 503, 76 So. 445; State v. Nix, 165 Ala. 126, 51 So. 754. Disturbing 'the peace of others * * * by conduct calculated to provoke a breach of the peace' discloses no particular act of the defendant. Under the rule followed in Gayden v. State, 38 Ala.App. 39, 80 So.2d 495,...
  • Mehaffey v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • Mayo 08, 1917
    ...insurance company, embezzled, etc. It will be noted that two of the alternatives in the first count and one in the second count do not describe a person within the statute. This renders both counts fatally defective. State v. Nix, 165 Ala. 126, 51 So. 754; v. State, 55 Ala. 64; Horton v. State, 53 Ala. 493; Hornsby v. State, 94 Ala. 55, 10 So. 522. The defect being of substance and involving an element of the offense, the indictment will not support a judgment, and...
  • Ingram v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • Marzo 04, 1941
    ...23 Ala.App. 168, 123 So. 237; Gilbreath v. State, 23 Ala.App. 162, 122 So. 309; Dix v. State, 8 Ala.App. 338, 62 So. 1007; Abercrombie v. State, 8 Ala.App. 326, 62 So. 966; State v. Nix, 165 Ala. 126, 51 So. 754; v. State, 140 Ala. 134, 137, 37 So. 225; Raisler v. State, 55 Ala. 64; Horton v. State, 53 Ala. 488; Noble v. State, 59 Ala. 73; Pickett v. State, 60 Ala. 77; Mitchell v. State, 2...
  • Get Started for Free