State v. Normile
| Decision Date | 15 October 1985 |
| Citation | 707 P.2d 584,300 Or. 162 |
| Parties | State v. Normile (Norman Richard) NOS. A31525, S32073 |
| Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
State v. Dixson
... ... If a police intrusion is a trespass into the defendant's home, papers or effects, it violates the defendant's rights. See State v. Normile, 74 Or.App. 545, 702 P.2d 1160, rev. den. 300 Or. 162, 707 P.2d 584 (1985); State v. Ohling, supra; State v. Russo, 68 Or.App. 760, 683 P.2d 163 (1984) ... 9 We do not suggest that defendants' privacy interests are measured solely by their property rights; however, those property rights ... ...
-
State v. Tanner
... ... See State v. McMurphy, 291 Or. 782, 785-86, 635 P.2d 372 (1981) ... The property was stolen. He had no rights in it. He was a thief. See Restatement (Second) Torts, § 895, illustration 6; cf State v. Normile, 74 Or.App. 545, 702 P.2d 1160, rev. den. 300 Or. 162, 707 P.2d 584 (1985) (defendant had rights in a rental car held after the rental term expired, but his rights were inferior to those of the police acting on behalf of the true owner) ... We reject defendant's rationale. No ... ...