State v. Ortiz
| Decision Date | 01 April 1996 |
| Citation | 236 Conn. 916,673 A.2d 1144 |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
| Parties | STATE of Connecticut v. Jose ORTIZ. |
Christopher L. Ulrich, Stamford, in support of the petition.
Frederick W. Fawcett, Assistant State's Attorney, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 40 Conn.App. 374, 671 A.2d 389 (AC 13786), is denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
18 cases
-
State v. DeJesus
...misconduct is not a matter of constitutional magnitude.... State v. Ortiz, 40 Conn. App. 374, 381, 671 A.2d 389, cert. denied, 236 Conn. 916, 673 A.2d 1144 (1996). If the failure to give any limiting instruction is not of constitutional magnitude, it would follow that the claimed failure to......
-
State v. Dews
...magnitude." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Ortiz, 40 Conn.App. 374, 381, 671 A.2d 389, cert. denied, 236 Conn. 916, 673 A.2d 1144 (1996). If the failure to give any limiting instruction is not of constitutional magnitude, it would follow that the claimed failure to give an ade......
-
State v. Cutler
...A.2d 59, cert. denied, 274 Conn. 901, 876 A.2d 13 (2005); State v. Ortiz, 40 Conn.App. 374, 381, 671 A.2d 389, cert. denied, 236 Conn. 916, 673 A.2d 1144 (1996). "If the failure to give any instruction is not of constitutional magnitude, it would follow that the claimed failure to give an a......
-
State v. Green
...v. Williams, 203 Conn. 159, 185, 523 A.2d 1284 (1987); see State v. Ortiz, 40 Conn. App. 374, 378, 671 A.2d 389, cert. denied, 236 Conn. 916, 673 A.2d 1144 (1996). Evidence of other misconduct, however, may be allowed for the purpose of proving many different things, such as intent, identit......
Request a trial to view additional results