State v. Packer Corp.
| Decision Date | 30 July 1931 |
| Docket Number | 5177 |
| Court | Utah Supreme Court |
| Parties | STATE v. PACKER CORPORATION |
Appeal from District Court, Third District, Salt Lake County; D. W Moffat, Judge.
The Packer Corporation was convicted for displaying a cigarette advertisement on a billboard owned and operated by it, and it appeals.
See also, 77 U. 500, 297 P. 1013.
AFFIRMED.
Dan B Shields, of Salt Lake City, and W. H. Reeder, Jr., of Ogden, for appellant.
Geo. P. Parker, Attorney General, and Byron D. Anderson, Deputy Attorney General, for the State.
This is an appeal by the defendant from the district court of Salt Lake county from a judgment of conviction and sentence to pay a fine for displaying on a billboard owned and operated by defendant an advertisement of Chesterfield cigarettes in violation of section 2 of an act amending section 2, chap. 145, Laws Utah 1921, as amended by chapter 52, Laws Utah 1923, as amended by chapter 92, Laws Utah 1929. The complaint charges:
"That the said Packer Corporation and George W. Hamlyn at the time and place aforesaid, did wilfully and unlawfully display in Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah, on a bill board owned and operated by the defendant, an advertisement of Chesterfield cigarettes by displaying a representation of a package of Chesterfield cigarettes with the words 'Good taste takes the lead'; contrary to the provisions of the Statute of the State aforesaid in such case made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the State of Utah."
Section 2, of chapter 92, Laws Utah 1929, the section under which this action is brought, reads as follows:
"It shall be a misdemeanor for any person, company, or corporation, to display on any bill board, street car sign, street car, placard, or on any other object or place of display, any advertisement of cigarettes, cigarette papers, cigars, chewing tobacco, or smoking tobacco, or any disguise or substitute of either, except that a dealer in cigarettes, cigarette papers, tobacco, or cigars or their substitutes, may have a sign on the front of his place of business stating that he is a dealer in such articles, provided that nothing herein shall be construed to prohibit the advertising of cigarettes, cigarette papers, chewing tobacco, smoking tobacco, or any disguise or substitute of either in any newspaper, magazine or periodical printed or circulating in the State of Utah."
A demurrer was interposed to the complaint and overruled by the court, which demurrer contained the following grounds:
"That said complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a public offense; that the Statute upon which said complaint is based violates the provisions of article, 1, § 1, of the Constitution of the State of Utah with respect to the inherent and inalienable right of the defendant to acquire, possess and protect its property; of article 1, § 7, of the Constitution of the State of Utah, with respect to deprivation of property without due process of law; of Article 1, Section 18 of the Constitution of the State of Utah, with respect to impairing the obligations of contracts; of article 1, § 24 of the Constitution of the State of Utah, relating to uniform operation of all laws of a general nature; (6) of article 8, § 5, of the Constitution of the State of Utah, in that said law, as amended, a direct imposition by the Legislature of the State of Utah, for a tax for the purpose of cities, towns and other municipal corporations; (7) of article 6, § 23, of the Constitution of the State of Utah, in that it contains more than one subject and that it is not a general appropriation bill or a bill for the codification and general revision of laws, and that the title does not clearly express the contents of the law; of article 1, § 10 of the Constitution of the United States, respecting impairing of the obligation of contracts; of article 1, § 8, of the Constitution of the United States relating to Interstate Commerce; of article 1, § 10, of the Constitution of the United States respecting impairing of the obligation of contracts; of article 4, § 2, of the Constitution of the United States respecting the privileges and immunities of citizens in the several states; of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States respecting the deprivation of property without due process of law and/or respecting the denial to persons within the jurisdiction of the State of Utah of the equal protection of the laws."
The state proved that the defendant, a foreign corporation maintaining an office in charge of a local manager and doing business within the state, owns, operates, and maintains numerous billboards at various places throughout the state, including one at the corner of Second West and Seventh North streets in Salt Lake City; upon which is a large lithograph poster 12 feet by 25 feet in size, containing a picture of a large gray horse bearing a lady rider, a picture of a package of Chesterfield cigarettes, with the words "Good taste takes the lead"; that Second West street is a highway carrying most of the traffic in and out of Salt Lake City to the communities north, and the billboard is in a conspicuous place where any one passing along the street can see it.
Defendant offered no evidence, but on cross-examination of the state's witnesses proved, over objection of the state, that Chesterfield cigarettes are shipped into the state from the place of manufacture, that the lithograph poster was printed outside the state and shipped in, and that the contract for advertising these cigarettes was made by the defendant company at its main office in Ohio.
Defendant assigns as error the action of the district court in overruling the demurrer, entering judgment of conviction, and passing of sentence. No question is raised as to the sufficiency of the evidence or regularity of the proceedings. Paragraphs 6 and 7 of the demurrer were not argued either orally or in the briefs, and therefore no reference to the matter contained therein is necessary. The arguments presented are wholly concerned with the constitutionality of the act in question, and are substantially the same as were considered and passed on by this court in the case of State v. Packer Corporation, 77 Utah 500, 297 P. 1013. ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Bell v. Idaho Finance Co.
... ... contract, which amount represents an interest rate greater than 8% allowed by the laws of the State" of Idaho, which usurious interest was knowingly reserved and charged by the defendants' ... \xC2" ... 38; Rose v. Wheeler, 140 Cal.App. 217, 35 P.2d 220; Dunn v. Midland Loan Finance Corp., 206 Minn. 550, 289 N.W. 411; London v. Toney, 263 N.Y. 439, 189 N.E. 485, 91 A.L.R. 1100; Stevens ... ...
-
State v. Mason
... ... differently situated were not possible, practical and ... realistic legislation would be impossible In the case of ... State v. Packer Corporation , 78 Utah 177, 2 ... P.2d 114, Packer Corporation v. Utah , 285 ... U.S. 105, 52 S.Ct. 273, 76 L.Ed. 643, 79 A. L. R. 546, it was ... ...
-
State v. Packard
...v. State Tax Comm., 98 Utah 170, 97 P.2d 937, 126 A.L.R. 1318; State v. Packer Corp., 77 Utah 500, 297 P. 1013; see also State v. Packer Corp., 78 Utah 177, 2 P.2d 114, Packer Corp. v. State, 285 U.S. 105, 52 S.Ct. 273, 76 L.Ed. The statute under consideration would curtail one of the basic......
-
Utah Light & Traction Co. v. State Tax Commission of Utah
... ... alike." Royster Guano Co. v. Virginia, ... 253 U.S. 412, 40 S.Ct. 560, 561, 64 L.Ed. 989. State ... v. Packer Corporation, 77 Utah 500, 297 P. 1013; ... Id., 78 Utah 177, 2 P.2d 114, affirmed Packer ... Corporation v. State of Utah, 285 U.S. 105, 52 ... ...