State v. Panek
| Decision Date | 20 September 2016 |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
| Parties | State of Connecticut v. John Panek |
323 Conn. 911
149 A.3d 980 (Mem)
State of Connecticut
v.
John Panek
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Decided September 20, 2016
Denise B. Smoker, senior assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 166 Conn. App. 613, 145 A.3d 924 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly construe the ‘not in plain view’ element of General Statutes § 53a–189a, the video voyeurism statute, in affirming the dismissal of charges against the defendant?”
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
State v. Rodriguez
... ... defense counsel. It is reasonable to assume that some ... reference to defendants would have been included in the text ... if the intent was to grant them any standing to bring a ... motion under it. See State v. Panek, 166 Conn.App ... 613, 625, 145 A.3d 924, cert. granted, 323 Conn ... 911, 149 A.3d 980 (2016) (" If, after examining [the] ... text and considering [its] relationship [with other relevant ... sections], the meaning of such text is plain and unambiguous ... and does ... ...
-
Finney v. Commissioner of Correction
... ... Practice Book § 23-29, of whether the petition should be ... dismissed for failing to state a claim for which relief could ... be granted. In response, the petitioner argued that a ... self-represented petitioner should have the ... and unambiguous, the words are to be given their ordinary ... meaning. State v. Panek, 166 Conn.App. 613, 626, 145 ... A.3d 924, cert. granted, 323 Conn. 911, 149 A.3d 980 (2016) ... There is nothing else in subsection ... ...
-
Eubanks v. Comm'r of Corr.
...323 Conn. 911149 A.3d 980 (Mem)David Eubanksv.Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut.Decided September 20, 2016Margaret Gaffney Radionovas, senior assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.Deren Manasevit, assigned counsel, in opposition.The respondent's petitio......