State v. Parker, 171

Decision Date01 September 1987
Docket NumberNo. 171,171
Citation541 A.2d 993,312 Md. 657
PartiesSTATE of Maryland v. Ronnie PARKER. ,
CourtMaryland Court of Appeals

Richard B. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen. (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen. and Ann E. Singleton, Asst. Atty. Gen., all on brief), Baltimore, for appellant.

Jose Felipe Anderson, Asst. Public Defender (Alan H. Murrell, Public Defender, both on brief), Baltimore, for appellee.

Argued before MURPHY, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, COLE, RODOWSKY, McAULIFFE, ADKINS and BLACKWELL, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari in the above entitled case having been granted and heard, it is this 7th day of June, 1988

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the writ of certiorari be, and it is hereby, dismissed with costs, the petition having been improvidently granted.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Wheeler v. State, 1423,Sept. Term,2016
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • July 3, 2017
    ...trial all the persons in the chain of custody. Id.In Parker v. State , 72 Md.App. 543, 531 A.2d 1035 (1987), cert. dismissed , 312 Md. 657, 541 A.2d 993 (1988) and Gillis v. State , 53 Md.App. 691, 456 A.2d 89, cert. denied , 296 Md. 111 (1983), we interpreted § 10–1003 rigidly. In Parker ,......
  • Martin v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • September 1, 1988
    ...531 A.2d 1035 (1987), cert. granted, 311 Md. 698, 537 A.2d 262 (1988), certiorari dismissed as being improvidently granted, June 7, 1988, 312 Md. 657, 541 A.2d 993, the defendant made a written demand under § 10-1003 that the chemist or analyst and others in the chain of custody appear as w......
  • Banks v. State, 1925
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • September 1, 1989
    ...analysis report and/or the chain of custody form." Parker v. State, 72 Md.App. 543, 548, 531 A.2d 1035 (1987), cert. dismissed, 312 Md. 657, 541 A.2d 993 (1988). In response to Parker, effective July 1, 1988, § 10-1002 was amended so that the definition of "chain of custody" included only t......
  • Wheeler v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • July 3, 2017
    ...the State produce at trial all the persons in the chain of custody. Id. In Parker v. State, 72 Md. App. 543 (1987), cert. dismissed, 312 Md. 657 (1988) and Gillis v. State, 53 Md. App. 691, cert. denied, 296 Md. 111 (1983), we interpreted §10-1003 rigidly. In Parker, we reversed where the S......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT