State v. Pearson
| Decision Date | 11 February 1905 |
| Docket Number | 14,057 |
| Citation | 70 Kan. 901,79 P. 1133 |
| Parties | THE STATE OF KANSAS v. MOSE PEARSON |
| Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Decided, January, 1905.
Appeal from Cherokee district court; WILLIAM B. GLASSE, judge.
Judgment affirmed.
Al. F. Williams, for The State.
Ira Heaton, and Skidmore & Walker, for appellant.
The only legal question presented in this case is whether the district court of Cherokee county lost jurisdiction to try a case at Columbus in December because the case was called at an adjourned term, which opened at Columbus in October and was adjourned over an intervening term of the same court held, as authorized by law, at Galena, in said county, in the month of November. It is conceded that this question has been answered in the negative in The State v. Crilly, 69 Kan. 802, 77 P. 701. We are asked to reverse the ruling in that case, which, after careful consideration, we decline to do.
The judgment in this case is affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State ex rel. Chick v. Davis
...446, 46 P. 349; Gonzales v. Cunningham, 164 U.S. 612, 41 L.Ed. 572, 17 S.Ct. 182; Bidwell v. Love, 22 Okla. 549, 98 P. 425; State v. Pearson, 70 Kan. 901, 79 P. 1133; In re Est. of Hunter, 84 Iowa 388, 51 N.W. These decisions, though discussed in the briefs, have little to do with the quest......
-
State Davis
...349; Gonzales v. Cunningham, 164 U. S. 626, 17 Sup. Ct. 182, 41 L. Ed. 572; Bidwell v. Love, 22 Okl. 549, 98 Pac. 425; State v. Pearson, 70 Kan. 901, 79 Pac. 1133; In re Estate of Hunter, 84 Iowa, loc. cit. 392, 51 N. W. 20. These decisions, though discussed in the briefs, have little to do......
-
Bidwell v. Love
... ... Supreme Court of the territory of Oklahoma, where the case ... was pending at the time of the admission of the state, and is ... now before this court for final disposition under the ... provisions of the enabling act (Act June 16, 1906, c. 3335, ... 34 Stat ... Courts of Kansas and New Mexico. State v. Crilly, 69 ... Kan. 802, 77 P. 701; State v. Pearson, 70 Kan. 901, ... 79 P. 1133; Territory ex rel. Hubbell v. Armijo (N ... M.) 89 P. 268. The rule announced by the courts in those ... cases is ... ...
-
Bidwell v. Love
...has been recently passed upon by the Supreme Courts of Kansas and New Mexico. State v. Crilly, 69 Kan. 802, 77 P. 701; State v. Pearson, 70 Kan. 901, 79 P. 1133; Territory ex rel. Hubbell v. Armijo (N. M.) 89 P. 267. The rule announced by the courts in those cases is the same as the rule an......