State v. Persinger

• Decision Date: 31 October 1882
• Citation: State v. Persinger, 76 Mo. 346 (Mo. 1882)
• Parties: THE STATE, Appellant, v. PERSINGER.
• Court: Missouri Supreme Court

76 Mo. 346

THE STATE, Appellant,

v.PERSINGER.

Supreme Court of Missouri.

October Term, 1882.

Appeal from Daviess Circuit Court.--HON. S. A. RICHARDSON, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

D. H. McIntyre, Attorney General, for the State.

No brief for respondent.

NORTON, J.

This case is before us on the appeal of the State from the action of the circuit court in quashing the indictment on defendant's motion. The indictment is founded on section 1, Laws 1870, page 46, and charges in substance that defendant disturbed the peace of Leonard Salmon, Jasper N. Bailey and divers other persons by loud and unusual noise, etc. The defendant filed motion to quash the indictment on the ground that the said act of 1870 was unconstitutional in so far as it attempted to make the disturbance of the peace of a person or persons an offense. We are of the opinion that the motion to quash was properly sustained for the reason that the said act was entitled “An act to change the penalty for disturbances of the peace.” This title only authorized the passage of an act changing the penalty for such disturbances of the peace as were then by law declared punishable. The said act of 1870, while it changed the punishment for such offenses, went further and undertook to amend the act of 1868 by so changing it, as to make it an offense for one person to disturb the peace of another person. While the title of the act embraced but one subject, namely, a change of the penalty for disturbing the peace, the body of the act not only included that subject, but also another, viz: amending the law so as to make that a disturbance of the peace under the act of 1870, which was not an...