State v. Petion
| Docket Number | SC19938 |
| Decision Date | 23 July 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
-
McKay v. Longman
... ... This court has addressed reverse veil piercing only once, in Commissioner of Environmental Protection v. State Five Industrial Park, Inc. , 304 Conn. 128, 37 A.3d 724 (2012) ( State Five ). 28 Although 211 A.3d 48 this court determined 332 Conn. 434 ... ...
-
Reclaimant Corp. v. Deutsch
... ... ECKER, J. 332 Conn. 592 The narrow issue presented by this appeal is whether the statute of limitations of the state of Connecticut or the state of Delaware governs the unjust enrichment claims brought by the plaintiff, Reclaimant Corp., against the defendants, ... ...
-
Carpenter v. Daar
...a departure from precedent to be supported by some special justification." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Petion , 332 Conn. 472, 503, 211 A.3d 991 (2019). "When a prior decision is seen so clearly as error that its enforcement [is] for that very reason doomed ... the court sh......
-
State v. Morlo M.
...disfigurement does not necessarily have to be permanent or in a location that is readily visible to others." State v. Petion , 332 Conn. 472, 491, 211 A.3d 991 (2019).In State v. Barretta , 82 Conn. App. 684, 846 A.2d 946, cert. denied, 270 Conn. 905, 853 A.2d 522 (2004), the following evid......
Request a trial to view additional results