State v. Petric
| Decision Date | 14 August 2020 |
| Docket Number | CR-17-0505 |
| Citation | State v. Petric, 333 So.3d 1063 (Ala. Crim. App. 2020) |
| Parties | STATE of Alabama v. Steven PETRIC |
| Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
Steve Marshall, atty. gen., and Audrey Jordan, asst. atty. gen., for appellant.
R. Ashby Pate of Lightfoot, Franklin & White, LLC, Birmingham; and Bryan C. Mulder, Teresa Lynn Reuter, Jacqueline Pruitt, Leif E. Peterson II, Brian W. Tobin, and Marisa Young (withdrew 03/12/2020) of Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, Illinois, for appellee.
The State of Alabama appeals the circuit court's order granting Steven Petric's petition for postconviction relief and setting aside Petric's capital-murder conviction and sentence of death.
In 2009, Petric was convicted of murdering Toni Lim during the course of a rape in the first degree, an offense defined as capital by § 13A-5-40(a)(3), Ala. Code 1975. The jury, by a vote of 10 to 2, recommended that Petric be sentenced to death. The circuit court sentenced Petric to death. On direct appeal, this Court affirmed Petric's capital-murder conviction and death sentence. See Petric v. State, 157 So. 3d 176 (Ala. Crim. App. 2013). The Alabama Supreme Court and the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari review. See Petric v. Alabama, 574 U.S. 1030, 135 S.Ct. 711, 190 L.Ed.2d 446 (2014), and Petric v. State (no. 1121404, May 23, 2014). This Court issued the certificate of judgment on May 23, 2014. See Rule 41(a)(1), Ala. R. App. P.
In May 2015, Petric filed a petition for postconviction relief pursuant to Rule 32, Ala. R. Crim. P., attacking his capital-murder conviction and death sentence.1 Petric filed an amended petition in May 2016. An evidentiary hearing was held. In February 2018, the circuit court issued an 118-page order granting Petric's petition after finding that Petric had been deprived of the effective assistance of counsel. The court ordered that Petric be given a new trial.2 The State then filed a timely notice of appeal to this Court.
On direct appeal, this Court stated the following concerning the facts surrounding the murder of Toni Lim:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Burgess v. State
... ... 746), failed to present a single witness or introduce a ... single exhibit (C. 746), and did not effectively engage an ... investigator (C. 754)." ( Id. ) Finally, Burgess ... asserts that his claims are like those made by the ... petitioners in State v. Petric, 333 So.3d 1063 ... (Ala.Crim.App.2020), and Hinton v. Alabama, 571 U.S ... 263 (2014). (Burgess's brief, pp. 26-27.) ... Merely ... listing claims and asserting that the circuit court erred ... does not comply with Rule 28(a)(10), Ala. R. App. P ... ...