State v. Pickard

Decision Date14 December 2006
Docket NumberNo. 395P06.,395P06.
Citation640 S.E.2d 59
PartiesSTATE of North Carolina v. Wesley Tate PICKARD.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
ORDER

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 2nd day of August 2006 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th day of December 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 2nd day of August 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th day of December 2006."

To continue reading

Request your trial
19 cases
  • State v. Bradshaw
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • October 4, 2011
    ...conclusions of law are supported by its factual findings, we will not disturb those conclusions on appeal." State v. Pickard, 178 N.C. App. 330, 333-34, 631 S.E.2d 203, 206, appeal dismissed and disc. review denied, 361 N.C. 177, 640 S.E.2d 59 (2006) (citation omitted). The appellate court ......
  • State v. Campbell
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • February 19, 2008
    ...L.Ed.2d 997 (2001)). "[T]he trial court's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo and must be legally correct." State v. Pickard, 178 N.C.App. 330, 334, 631 S.E.2d 203, 206, appeal dismissed and disc. rev, denied, 361 N.C. 177; 640 S.E.2d 59 Defendant first contends that the evidence should......
  • State v. Eddings
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • November 2, 2021
    ...618, 619 (1982). "[T]he trial court's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo and must be legally correct." State v. Pickard , 178 N.C. App. 330, 334, 631 S.E.2d 203, 206, disc. review denied , 361 N.C. 177, 640 S.E.2d 59 (2006). ¶ 13 Pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-244, an application fo......
  • State v. Reyes, No. COA07-693 (N.C. App. 12/18/2007)
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • December 18, 2007
    ...does not assign error to any findings of fact, those findings are presumed to be supported by competent evidence, State v. Pickard, 178 N.C. App. 330, 334, 631 S.E.2d 203, 206, disc. rev. denied, appeal dismissed, 361 N.C. 177, 640 S.E.2d 59 (2006) (citations omitted), and are conclusive an......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT