State v. Priestley
| Decision Date | 31 October 1881 |
| Parties | THE STATE v. PRIESTLEY, Appellant |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Henry Circuit Court.--HON. F. P. WRIGHT, Judge.
REVERSED.
J. H. Lay and Smith & Shirk for appellant.
D. H. McIntyre, Attorney General, for the State.
At the May term, 1879, of the Benton circuit court, the defendant was indicted for an assault upon Virginia McPherson, with intent forcibly to ravish and carnally know her. The cause was taken by change of venue to Henry county, and on a trial had at the December term, 1879, of said court, defendant was convicted, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $200. From that judgment he has prosecuted his appeal.
The testimony of Virginia McPherson was, in substance, that one Osborn was a son-in-law of defendant and lived in Benton county; that her mother lived about a mile from Osborn's; that the defendant came to the residence of witness' mother and said that his daughter, Mrs. Osborn, was sick and wanted witness to go and stay with her at defendant's house. Witness consented to go. Defendant came on horseback, and witness rode behind him from her home. It was about five o'clock in the afternoon. After they started, defendant made an excuse to go through the timber, saying that he wanted to see about his cattle. There were three different ways by which he could go--one, a plain big road on the prairie, and one through the timber, and another prairie road. Road through the timber was a pathway. He took the timber road--turned off after going a short distance. Went by his pasture where he turned off. Saw no cattle. The pasture was a half quarter of a mile from where he turned off. He went to a little grove, and said, “get down and let's have a little hugging and kissing.” This was about half way between Priestley's and Osborn's. No houses were in sight. When he made the above remark he was on the horse, and witness said she would get down and go on. He said we will go on directly. He got down and went four or five steps to a pair of bars, and let them down, holding the bridle over his arm. He began to rub witness on the leg, saying, “let me rub the ticklish off.” His hand was under witness' clothes. She kicked him and pushed him away. He dropped his pocket-book, picked it up, and took out a piece of money and said, “you can't handle this, but somebody can for you.” He made no attempt to pull her off of the horse, desisted when she told him to do so--no one was in sight, nor did anything occur to frighten him from the accomplishment of the alleged purpose. Without any further demonstration, he remounted his horse and rode home, with witness behind him, and arrived there about sundown, where she staid all night. Afterward she spent another night at Priestley's and rode home behind him the next morning. There was no other evidence of any...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Hilsabeck
...his desires at all hazards, regardless of the utmost resistance of the female. The evidence in this case shows no such intent. State v. Priestly, 74 Mo. 24; v. Owsley, 102 Mo. 678; State v. White, 52 Mo.App. 289. (9) It must be remembered that there is a wide difference between an assault w......
-
State v. Pinkard
...to show that it was defendant's intention to accomplish his purpose (rape) and to overcome any and all resistance at all hazards. State v. Priestly, 74 Mo. 24; State Ousley, 102 Mo. 678; State v. Harney, 101 Mo. 470; State v. Hayden, 141 Mo. 312; State v. Sholl, 130 Mo. 396; State v. Espenc......
-
State v. Davis
...Mo. 43; State v. Ruckman, 253 Mo. 487. (g) There can be no attempt to murder without an assault. State v. Sullivan, 84 S.W. 109; State v. Priestly, 74 Mo. 24; State Harney, 101 Mo. 470; State v. Headley, 224 Mo. 177; State v. Hayden, 141 Mo. 311; State v. Scholl, 130 Mo. 396; State v. Pries......
-
The State v. Foster
... ... There can be no assault with intent to maim except "of ... malice aforethought," because such an assault is a ... deliberate assault conceived and carried out for the purpose ... of maiming the subject of the assault. State v ... Priestley, 74 Mo. 24; State v. Dalton, 106 Mo ... 464; State v. Whitsett, 111 Mo. 202; State v ... School, 130 Mo. 396; State v. Hayden, 141 Mo ... 311. (6) The defendant was entitled to have the jury ... instructed as to the meaning of the word maim and that the ... assault must have been with the ... ...