State v. R.J.B. (In re R.J.B.)

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
Citation268 Or.App. 370,342 P.3d 142 (Mem)
Decision Date31 December 2014
Docket Number14CC01134,A157295.
PartiesIn the Matter of R.J.B., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. R.J.B., Appellant.

Charles Kochlacs filed the brief for appellant.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Jona J. Maukonen, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before SERCOMBE, Presiding Judge, and HADLOCK, Judge, and TOOKEY, Judge.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of an order committing him for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. He contends that the trial court committed plain error when it failed to advise him of his right to subpoena witnesses. See ORS 426.100(1) (providing that the court shall advise the person of, among other things, [t]he right to subpoena witnesses”). The state concedes that the court's failure constitutes plain error and requires reversal. We agree, accept the state's concession, and conclude that it is appropriate to exercise our discretion to correct the plain error for the reasons stated in State v. M.L.R., 256 Or.App. 566, 303 P.3d 954 (2013). See id. at 570–72, 303 P.3d 954 (observing that “plain error review of violations of ORS 426.100(1) is justified by the nature of civil commitment proceedings, the relative interests of the parties in those proceedings, the gravity of the violation, and the ends of justice” and exercising discretion to correct the plain error (internal quotation marks omitted)). Because we reverse the judgment on that basis, we do not address appellant's second and third assignments of error.

Reversed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Wade v. Brockamp
    • United States
    • Oregon Court of Appeals
    • January 7, 2015
    ...Or.App. 373342 P.3d 142Ashley Rachelle WADE, Petitioner–Respondentv.Kim BROCKAMP, SuperintendentCoffee Creek Correctional Facility, Defendant–Appellant.C096022CVA151622.Court of Appeals of Oregon.Argued and Submitted Sept. 6, 2013.Decided Jan. 7, 2015.342 P.3d 144Inge D. Wells, Senior Assis......
  • State v. L.J.L. (In re L.J.L.), 301306342
    • United States
    • Oregon Court of Appeals
    • December 31, 2014

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT