State v. Ragland, No. 226P13.
| Docket Nº | No. 226P13. |
| Citation | 747 S.E.2d 548 |
| Case Date | August 27, 2013 |
| Court | United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina |
747 S.E.2d 548
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Joseph RAGLAND.
No. 226P13.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Aug. 27, 2013.
Kimberly P. Hoppin, for Ragland, Joseph.
John F. Oates, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.
Susan I. Doyle, for State of North Carolina.
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st of May 2013 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A–31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
“Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of August 2013.”
To continue reading
Request your trial
14 practice notes
-
State v. Rankin, COA17-396
...and his mistake in failing to name this Court in his notice of appeal [did] not warrant dismissal"), disc. review denied , 367 N.C. 220, 747 S.E.2d 548 (2013). Accordingly, we deny Defendant’s petition for writ of certiorari as moot and proceed to consider the merits of her appeal.II. Valid......
-
State v. Gantt, COA19-995
...757 S.E.2d 690, 692 (2014) (quoting State v. Ragland , 226 N.C. App. 547, 553, 739 S.E.2d 616, 620, disc. review denied , 367 N.C. 220, 747 S.E.2d 548 (2013) ). Accordingly, neither of these technical deficiencies are jurisdictional in this case.844 S.E.2d 350 Additionally, "a party upon wh......
-
State v. Rowe, COA13–308.
...service has not been waived. See also State v. Ragland, ––– N.C.App. ––––, ––––, 739 S.E.2d 616, 620,disc. review denied,––– N.C. ––––, 747 S.E.2d 548 (2013). 3. The fact that Defendant's girlfriend did not see Defendant hit Bryson is not positive evidence that Defendant did not, in fact, h......
-
State v. Walker, COA22-338
...to appeal to this Court.'" (quoting State v. Ragland, 226 N.C.App. 547, 553, 739 S.E.2d 616, 620, disc. review denied, 367 N.C. 220, 747 S.E.2d 548 (2013)). Nevertheless, for purposes of ensuring our appellate jurisdiction over Defendant's appeal, in our discretion, we allow Defendant's Pet......
Request a trial to view additional results
12 cases
-
State v. Rankin, No. COA17-396
...and his mistake in failing to name this Court in his notice of appeal [did] not warrant dismissal"), disc. review denied , 367 N.C. 220, 747 S.E.2d 548 (2013). Accordingly, we deny Defendant’s petition for writ of certiorari as moot and proceed to consider the merits of her appeal.II. Valid......
-
State v. Gantt, No. COA19-995
...757 S.E.2d 690, 692 (2014) (quoting State v. Ragland , 226 N.C. App. 547, 553, 739 S.E.2d 616, 620, disc. review denied , 367 N.C. 220, 747 S.E.2d 548 (2013) ). Accordingly, neither of these technical deficiencies are jurisdictional in this case.844 S.E.2d 350 Additionally, "a party upon wh......
-
State v. Rowe, No. COA13–308.
...service has not been waived. See also State v. Ragland, ––– N.C.App. ––––, ––––, 739 S.E.2d 616, 620,disc. review denied,––– N.C. ––––, 747 S.E.2d 548 (2013). 3. The fact that Defendant's girlfriend did not see Defendant hit Bryson is not positive evidence that Defendant did not, in fact, h......
-
State v. Walker, COA22-338
...to appeal to this Court.'" (quoting State v. Ragland, 226 N.C.App. 547, 553, 739 S.E.2d 616, 620, disc. review denied, 367 N.C. 220, 747 S.E.2d 548 (2013)). Nevertheless, for purposes of ensuring our appellate jurisdiction over Defendant's appeal, in our discretion, we allow Defendant's Pet......
Request a trial to view additional results