State v. Ramirez, M-5/6/7 September Term 2021
| Court | United States State Supreme Court (New Jersey) |
| Citation | 248 N.J. 252,258 A.3d 359 (Table) |
| Decision Date | 16 September 2021 |
| Parties | STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Oscar RAMIREZ, Defendant-Movant. |
| Docket Number | 085943,M-5/6/7 September Term 2021 |
248 N.J. 252
258 A.3d 359 (Table)
STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Oscar RAMIREZ, Defendant-Movant.
M-5/6/7 September Term 2021
085943
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
September 16, 2021
ORDER
It is ORDERED that the motion for leave to file a motion for leave to appeal as within time (M-5) is granted; and it is further
ORDERED that the motion for stay (M-7) is denied; and it is further
ORDERED that the motion for leave to appeal (M-6) is granted; and it is further
ORDERED that the appellant may electronically serve and file a supplemental brief on or before November 1, 2021, and respondent may electronically serve and file a supplemental brief thirty (30) days after the filing of appellant's supplemental submission, or, if appellant declines to file such a submission, on or before December 1, 2021.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Ramirez, A-1-21
...expressed instructions," would violate her right to privacy. 467 N.J.Super. 359, 369 (App. Div. 2021). The Court granted leave to appeal. 248 N.J. 252 (2021) HELD: After reviewing the relevant statutes and authorities that must be considered in balancing the competing interests and rights o......
-
State v. Ramirez, A-1-21
...instructions," would violate her right to privacy. 467 N.J.Super. 359, 369 (App. Div. 2021). The Court granted leave to appeal. 248 N.J. 252 (2021) HELD: After reviewing the relevant statutes and authorities that must be considered in balancing the competing interests and rights of a s......