State v. Reeves
Decision Date | 05 May 2009 |
Docket Number | No. 2006-KA-2419.,2006-KA-2419. |
Citation | 11 So.3d 1031 |
Parties | STATE of Louisiana v. Jason Manuel REEVES. |
Court | Louisiana Supreme Court |
Capital Appeals Project, Jelpi Pierre Picou, Jr., G. Benjamin Cohen, New Orleans, for Appellant.
James D. Caldwell, Attorney General, John F. DeRosier, District Attorney, Frederick Wayne Frey, Carla Sue Sigler, Cynthia Skerrett Killingsworth, Assistant District Attorneys, for Appellee.
On December 13, 2001, a Calcasieu Parish grand jury indicted the defendant, Jason Reeves, for the first degree murder of a four year old girl, identified as M.J.T., which occurred on November 12, 2001, in violation of La. R.S. 14:30.Reeves' first trial began with jury selection on October 27, 2003, and ended in a mistrial on November 9, 2003.
Reeves' retrial commenced with jury selection on October 12, 2004.On November 5, 2004, the jury returned a unanimous verdict of guilty as charged.After a penalty phase hearing, the same jury unanimously recommended a sentence of death after finding as aggravating circumstances: (1)the defendant was engaged in the perpetration or attempted perpetration of aggravated rape; (2) the victim was under the age of twelve years; and (3) the offense was committed in an especially heinous, atrocious or cruel manner.On December 10, 2004, after denying post-verdict motions, the trial court imposed the sentence of death in accordance with the jury's verdict.
The defendant now brings the direct appeal of his conviction and sentence to this court pursuant to La. Const. art. 5, § 5(D).1After a thorough review of the law and the evidence, we find that none of the arguments put forth by the defendant constitute reversible error, and affirm the defendant's conviction and sentence.
No challenge is raised to the sufficiency of the evidence used to convict the defendant of first degree murder.After our review of the record, we find the following facts to be proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
On November 12, 2001, at approximately 3:15 p.m., the Calcasieu Parish Sheriff's Office(CPSO) received a complaint of a suspicious vehicle at a school in Moss Bluff, Louisiana.The vehicle was described as a blue four-door, older model vehicle which may have been an Oldsmobile Cutlass.The driver of the vehicle, who was described as wearing a maroon t-shirt and blue jeans, was loitering in the parking lot of the school and conversing with two young female students.The complaint included the license plate number of the suspicious vehicle.A check on the license plate revealed that the defendant, Jason Manuel Reeves, was the owner of a blue Oldsmobile Cutlass, with the same license plate number, and that he had a criminal history of sexual offenses with minors.
Shortly thereafter, at 5:02 p.m., the CPSO received a 911 call from the mother of a four-year old girl, M.J.T., who had disappeared from McFatter Trailer Park in Moss Bluff.3The trailer park is located 3 miles from the school where the suspicious vehicle had been reported.The young girl's mother, C.T., told sheriff's deputies that she had seen a suspicious, older model, blue vehicle circling the trailer park prior to the time she realized her daughter was missing.She also remembered a red sticker in the vehicle's rear window.C.T. later identified Reeves' vehicle as the one she saw in the trailer park on November 12, 2001.
That evening, CPSO deputies went to Reeves' home and obtained permission from him, and his mother with whom he lived, to search his vehicle and home.After finding no evidence connecting Reeves to the missing girl, the deputies informed Reeves of his constitutional rights and asked him to go to the sheriff's office for further questioning.Reeves agreed and followed the deputies in his own car to the CPSO because he did not know where the sheriff's office was located.
Reeves arrived at the CPSO at approximately 10:20 p.m., was informed of his constitutional rights, and signed a form waiving them.He was initially questioned from 10:45 p.m. until 12:40 a.m.4Thereafter, Reeves was taken to an interview room in the detectives' area, which is a secure area.5Reeves was again informed of his constitutional rights and was questioned throughout the night with regard to his whereabouts and activities on November 12, 2001.
Reeves told the officers that he had finished work at approximately 3 p.m., purchased a drink at a gas station, and driven home, arriving at approximately 4 p.m. Judy Doucet, the defendant's mother, told sheriff's deputies that she specifically remembered her son arriving home around 5:00 p.m. or 5:30 p.m.Throughout questioning, Reeves continually denied any involvement with the missing girl.These statements were not recorded.
From the time M.J.T. was reported missing until sometime on November 13, 2001, individuals assisting in the search for M.J.T. recovered evidence from a creek located approximately 15 minutes from McFatter Trailer Park, near a wooden bridge on Charles Breaux Road.The victim's mother identified a pair of a child's white tennis shoes and a pair of girl's purple pants as having been worn by M.J.T. at the time of her disappearance.
On November 13, 2001, at 9:16 a.m., deputies obtained Reeves' permission to obtain his bodily substances for testing, then transported him to a local hospital where the requested samples were obtained.A nurse collected blood samples, oral swabs, pubic hair combings and fingernail scrapings from Reeves.A physical examination of Reeves at this time showed scratches on the inside of his left upper thigh, on his nose, and on his arms.He also had abrasions on both knees.
Around 11:40 a.m. on November 13, 2001, Reeves was placed under arrest on an outstanding warrant from another parish.At that time, Reeves was again informed of his constitutional rights, interrogated further, and then placed in the jail.During this interview, a detective made the statement that only two people knew what really happened to M.J.T. Reeves replied, "Yeah, me and the good Lord."6Despite making this statement, Reeves continued to deny involvement with the disappearance of M.J.T.
On November 14, 2001, at approximately 11 a.m., deputies took Reeves from his jail cell to the detectives' interview area where he was again Mirandized.Reeves continued to deny involvement with the missing girl but further details which had emerged in questioning were now preserved on videotape.While still maintaining he finished work around 2:30 p.m. or 3:00 p.m., he related that he had driven in the direction of the Chardele Trailer Park to visit his cousin, but turned around when he realized he did not know his cousin's trailer number.Reeves then headed back in the direction of Moss Bluff, stopping at a convenience store to purchase a Mountain Dew soft drink.He claimed he traveled along a highway toward his grandfather's house, but remembered en route that his grandfather would not be home.Reeves then claimed he turned around in the parking lot of a Moss Bluff school, speaking briefly to a woman there.He continued traveling and stopped along the way at McFatter Trailer Park to see an old friend, Kurt Leger, with whom he had worked offshore.He asked a group of children at the trailer park if they knew where his friend Kurt lived.Reeves then claimed his car overheated, so he waited for the vehicle to cool down before driving home, where he claimed to have arrived by 4:00 p.m.This statement concluded when lunch was brought to Reeves at 12:40 p.m.
At approximately 2:30 p.m. on November 14, 2001, the body of M.J.T. was found in a secluded area in some woods, 10-15 yards off a trail next to LeBleu Cemetery.The cemetery is located approximately 8.2 miles from McFatter Trailer Park.7A Mountain Dew soft drink bottle was recovered approximately 25 feet away from where the body was found.The little girl's body, clothed only in a purple shirt pulled up halfway and naked from the waist down, had been stabbed multiple times.M.J.T. was found lying on her back with her legs bent, with signs of sexual abuse evident.Before evidence was gathered or the body was touched, law enforcement officers videotaped the crime scene.
Interrogation of Reeves began again around 8 p.m. Former FBI Agent Don Dixon confronted Reeves with photographs of M.J.T.'s body taken at the murder scene.As a pre-arranged strategy, Agent Dixon told Reeves that a latent print found on a palmetto leaf tied him to the murder scene.8At 9:25 p.m., detectives began videotaping the interview, during which Reeves confessed to having the girl in his car and taking her to the cemetery.He walked with her into the nearby woods, where they sat down and watched a rabbit.Reeves whittled a piece of wood with his pocket knife.Reeves then claimed he blacked out and does not remember doing anything else to the little girl.The next thing Reeves remembers was walking toward his car parked in the cemetery's parking lot, stopping at his sister's grave, saying good-bye and that he was sorry.When he reached his car, he noticed his pants were unzipped and his knife was missing.
Reeves had requested to speak with his mother.At 10:40 p.m., the videotape was stopped when Reeves' mother arrived at the sheriff's office.One of the detectives monitored Reeves' conversation with his mother and heard Reeves say, 9
Thereafter, Reeves indicated that he wanted to finish the interview because his actions had hurt his mother and the victim's family.Reeves was Mirandized again and continued his statement at 11:12 p.m.He expanded his earlier statements and acknowledged that he picked up M.J.T. to "go fool with her."He took her to the cemetery since the cemetery was a secluded place.After visiting his sister's grave and becoming very angry, Reeves took M.J.T. to the woods and started touching her on her bottom.Reeves admitted he told M.J.T....
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
- State v. Norton
-
Reeves v. Louisiana
...558 U.S. 1031130 S.Ct. 637175 L.Ed.2d 49078 USLW 3293Jason Manuel REEVES, petitioner,v.LOUISIANA.No. 09–6565.Supreme Court of the United StatesNov. 16, 2009. Case below,
11 So.3d 1031. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Louisiana ... -
State v. Verrette, No. 2010 KA 0102 (La. App. 6/11/2010)
...12/3/03), 861 So.2d 118, 129, cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1005, 124 S.Ct. 2023, 158 L.Ed.2d 522 (2004). If a defendant is indigent, he has the right to court-appointed counsel. State v. Reeves, 2006-2419 (La. 5/5/09),
11 So.3d 1031, 1057. The right of a defendant to counsel of his choice has been implemented by La. Code Crim. P. art. 515, which provides in pertinent part that, "Assignment of counsel shall not deprive the defendant of the... -
State v. Otkins-Victor
...his choice, a defendant must exercise his right to counsel of his choice at a reasonable time, in a reasonable manner, and at an appropriate stage of the proceedings. State v. Reeves, 06–2419 (La.5/5/09),
11 So.3d 1031, 1057, cert. denied, 558 U.S. 1031, 130 S.Ct. 637, 175 L.Ed.2d 490 (2009) ; State v. Bridgewater, 00–1529 (La.1/15/02), 823 So.2d 877, cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1227, 123 S.Ct. 1266, 154 L.Ed.2d 1089...