State v. Rivera

Citation302 Conn. 922,28 A.3d 342
PartiesSTATE of Connecticutv.Raymond RIVERA.
Decision Date14 September 2011
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

OPINION TEXT STARTS HEREJohn C. Drapp III, Bridgeport, in support of the petition.Sarah Hanna, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 129 Conn.App. 619, 22 A.3d 636, is denied.

EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Fine v. Comm'r of Corr.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • December 17, 2013
    ....'' (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Rivera, 129 Conn. App. 619, 629, 22 A.3d 636, cert. denied, 302 Conn. 922, 28 A.3d 342 (2011). ''Relevant cases instruct that [a] defendant in a criminal prosecution may waive one or more of his or her fundamental rights. .......
  • State v. Castro
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • April 6, 2020
    ...Specifically, the defendant argues that, pursuant to State v. Rivera , 129 Conn. App. 619, 632, 22 A.3d 636, cert. denied, 302 Conn. 922, 28 A.3d 342 (2011), counsel's waiver of a defendant's sixth amendment right to confrontation is invalid unless (1) the defendant does not dissent from hi......
  • State v. Castro
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • September 29, 2020
    ...Specifically, the defendant argues that, pursuant to State v. Rivera, 129 Conn. App. 619, 632, 22 A.3d 636, cert. denied, 302 Conn. 922, 28 A.3d 342 (2011), counsel's waiver of a defendant's sixth amendment right to confrontation is invalid unless (1) the defendant does not dissent from his......
  • State v. Fleury, AC 32183
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • May 22, 2012
    ...(Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Rivera, 129 Conn. App. 619, 630, 22 A.3d 636, cert. denied, 302 Conn. 922, 28 A.3d 342 (2011). The defendant's personal disagreement with the tactical decisions of counsel is therefore not relevant to our analysis; State v. Stew......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT