State v. Roberts
Decision Date | 17 May 1887 |
Citation | 15 Or. 187,13 P. 896 |
Parties | STATE v. ROBERTS. |
Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
Appeal from Multnomah county.
Indictment for arson.Defendant was convicted below.
John Burnett and A. Lenhart, for appellant.
N.D Simon, for respondent.
On the fifteenth day of February, 1887, the grand jury of Multnomah county returned into the circuit court of that county an indictment against the defendant, charging him with the crime of arson.The charging part of said indictment is as follows "The said Illis Roberts, on the thirtieth day of JulyA.D. 1886, in the county of Multnomah and state of Oregon did willfully, maliciously, unlawfully, and feloniously set fire to and burn, in the night-time, a barn of another, namely, the barn of W.S. Ladd, situated in the county of Multnomah and state of Oregon, with intent to injure thereby the said W.S. Ladd."
The testimony offered upon the trial tended to prove that the defendant and Robert A. Burnys and Charles Gale conspired together, in the month of July, 1886, for the purpose of burning this barn.Their reason for doing so was, as stated by the defendant, Roberts, that "Ladd had no business to hire Chinamen."Burnys pleaded guilty to an indictment for the same offense, and was sentenced to imprisonment for five years.This defendant, after a trial before a jury, was found guilty, and sentenced to be punished by imprisonment for six years, from which judgment he has appealed to this court.
This case is one of considerable importance, and the rulings of the court below cannot be properly understood without a pretty full statement of the evidence given upon the trial.
Mrs. Almira Burnys was the first witness on the part of the state, and she testified as follows:
On cross-examination, the witness testified:
J. Barry, a witness for the state, testified that he went to Burnys' house, and searched the premises.The cans of powder were then offered in evidence.
Charles Gale, also a witness on the part of the state, testified substantially as follows:
Robert Burnys, after he had pleaded guilty to the indictment against him, and before he was sentenced, was also called as a witness on the part of the state, and testified, in substance: . ...
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
State v. Williams
...the one that the defendant in State v. Morey attacked, and he attacks the term "moral certainty," which the defendant in State v. Roberts, 15 Or. 187, 13 P. 896 (1887), specifically sought to have included in the instruction in his Oregon law is clear, however, on one point. Including the t......
-
State v. Dennis
...said, "He told me he didn't know the gun was loaded." It is therefore not clear that there was any evidence of a crime. State v. Roberts, 15 Or. 187, 13 P. 896. (3) The defendant, in the absence of the jury, made a formal offer of proof concerning the entire transaction leading up to the al......
-
State v. Taylor
...v. Liberman, 59 N.D. 252, 229 N.W. 363; State v. McCune, 16 Utah 170, 51 P. 818; Emery v. State, 101 Wis. 627, 78 N.W. 145; State v. Roberts, 15 Or. 187, 13 P. 896; Wallace v. State, 41 Fla. 547, 26 So. 713; People v. Guidici, 100 N.Y. 503, 3 N.E. 493; State v. Grant, 20 S.D. 164, 105 N.W. ......
-
State v. O'Donnell
... ... State v. Roberts, 15 Or. 187, 13 P. 896; Phillips v. People, 57 Barb. 353; Hickam v. People, 137 Ill. 75, 27 N.E. 88; [36 Or. 225] Turner v. State, 102 Ind. 425, 1 N.E. 869; Com. v. Robinson, 146 Mass. 571, 16 N.E. 452; People v. Foley, 64 Mich. 148, 31 N.W. 94; State v. Williamson, 106 Mo. 162, 17 S.W. 172; State ... ...