State v. Rodgers
| Decision Date | 28 April 2022 |
| Docket Number | 67, Sept. Term, 2021 |
| Parties | STATE of Maryland v. De'Shon C. RODGERS |
| Court | Court of Special Appeals of Maryland |
Submitted by Derek Simmonsen, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Brian E. Frosh, Atty. Gen. of Maryland, Baltimore, MD)
Submitted by Harmon L. Cooper, Assigned Public Defender (Crowell & Moring LLP, Washington, DC; Brian L. Zavin, Public Defender of Maryland, Baltimore, MD.
Submitted before: Fader, C.J. Watts, Hotten, Booth, Biran, Gould, Eaves, JJ.
The Court having considered and granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in the above-captioned case, it is this 28th day of April, 2022
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to that Court to consider whether or not the holding in Lopez-Villa v. State , No. 22 (September Term, 2021) should be applied in this case and, if so, to reconsider its prior opinion concerning whether the trial court erred in not asking requested voir dire question(s); and it is further
ORDERED, that the case is remanded to the Court of Special Appeals for consideration and resolution of the remaining two issues raised on brief by Respondent, De'Shon C. Rodgers, before that Court, namely:
and it is further
ORDERED, that costs are to be paid by Respondent.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Rodgers v. State
...this case and, if so, to reconsider its prior opinion concerning whether the trial court erred in not asking requested voir dire questions[.]" Id. Further, the ordered that the case be remanded "for consideration and resolution of the remaining two issues raised on brief by Respondent, De'S......
-
Rodgers v. State
...this case and, if so, to reconsider its prior opinion concerning whether the trial court erred in not asking requested voir dire questions[.]" Id. Further, the ordered that the case be remanded "for consideration and resolution of the remaining two issues raised on brief by Respondent, De'S......