State v. Rodgers, (S056239).
| Decision Date | 12 September 2008 |
| Docket Number | No. (S056239).,(S056239). |
| Citation | 194 P.3d 147,345 Or. 301 |
| Parties | STATE v. RODGERS. |
| Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
Petition for review allowed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
8 cases
-
State v. Primeaux
...an "unreasonable search, or seizure." We summarized the circumstances that create an unreasonable traffic stop in State v. Rodgers, 219 Or.App. 366, 370-71, 182 P.3d 209, rev. allowed, 345 Or. 301, 194 P.3d 147 "To be reasonable, traffic stops must be supported by reasonable suspicion that ......
-
State v. Hawkins
...would not have been in a position to obtain his statements admitting to possession of the seized methamphetamine. See State v. Rodgers, 219 Or.App. 366, 374, 182 P.3d 209, rev. allowed, 345 Or. 301, 194 P.3d 147 (2008) (the requisite causal nexus is established where, "but for the unlawful ......
-
State v. Huggett
...other grounds on recons., 217 Or.App. 470, 175 P.3d 1024, rev. den., 344 Or. 671, 189 P.3d 26 (2008). As we explained in State v. Rodgers, 219 Or.App. 366, 182 P.3d 209, rev. allowed, 345 Or. 301, 194 P.3d 147 (2008), questioning unrelated to the initial basis for a stop can lead to unlawfu......
-
State v. Hitchcock/Winters, CR030978
...for it to be reasonable under Article I, section 9. We recently noted that principle in the context of traffic stops in State v. Rodgers, 219 Or.App. 366, 182 P.3d 209, rev. allowed, 345 Or. 301, 194 P.3d 147 (2008). In Rodgers, we upheld the suppression of evidence obtained during a consen......
Request a trial to view additional results