Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United States | 1-929-605-4013

State v. Rodgers

Document Cited in 71 Precedent Map Related
Decision Date12 September 2008
Docket NumberNo. (S056239).,(S056239).
Citation194 P.3d 147,345 Or. 301
PartiesSTATE v. RODGERS.
CourtOregon Supreme Court

194 P.3d 147

345 Or. 301

STATE v. RODGERS.

No. (S056239).

Supreme Court of Oregon.

September 12, 2008.

(A128857) 219 Or.App. 366, 182 P.3d 209.

Petition for review allowed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • State v. Primeaux
    • United States
    • Oregon Court of Appeals
    • August 26, 2009
    ...an "unreasonable search, or seizure." We summarized the circumstances that create an unreasonable traffic stop in State v. Rodgers, 219 Or.App. 366, 370-71, 182 P.3d 209, rev. allowed, 345 Or. 301, 194 P.3d 147 "To be reasonable, traffic stops must be supported by reasonable suspicion that ......
  • State v. Hawkins
    • United States
    • Oregon Court of Appeals
    • January 21, 2009
    ...would not have been in a position to obtain his statements admitting to possession of the seized methamphetamine. See State v. Rodgers, 219 Or.App. 366, 374, 182 P.3d 209, rev. allowed, 345 Or. 301, 194 P.3d 147 (2008) (the requisite causal nexus is established where, "but for the unlawful ......
  • State v. Huggett
    • United States
    • Oregon Court of Appeals
    • May 27, 2009
    ...other grounds on recons., 217 Or.App. 470, 175 P.3d 1024, rev. den., 344 Or. 671, 189 P.3d 26 (2008). As we explained in State v. Rodgers, 219 Or.App. 366, 182 P.3d 209, rev. allowed, 345 Or. 301, 194 P.3d 147 (2008), questioning unrelated to the initial basis for a stop can lead to unlawfu......
  • State v. Hitchcock/Winters
    • United States
    • Oregon Court of Appeals
    • November 19, 2008
    ...for it to be reasonable under Article I, section 9. We recently noted that principle in the context of traffic stops in State v. Rodgers, 219 Or.App. 366, 182 P.3d 209, rev. allowed, 345 Or. 301, 194 P.3d 147 (2008). In Rodgers, we upheld the suppression of evidence obtained during a consen......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT