State v. Ruggiero, A--39

Decision Date12 November 1957
Docket NumberNo. A--39,A--39
Citation135 A.2d 859,25 N.J. 292
PartiesSTATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Louis RUGGIERO, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court

On appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 43 N.J.Super. 156, 128 A.2d 7.

Louis Ruggiero, in pro. per., for appellant.

Vincent P. Keuper and Solomon Lautman, Asbury Park, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Jayne in the court below.

For affirmance: Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices HEHER, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and PROCTOR--6.

For reversal: None.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Liberty Nat. Bank v. Aetna Life & Cas. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey
    • June 24, 1983
    ...the name of a person who did not exist as the maker (State v. Ruggiero, 43 N.J.Super. 156, 128 A.2d 7 (App.Div.1956), aff'd, 25 N.J. 292, 135 A.2d 859 (1957)). The Bank argues (1) that the CDs were forged because Starns signed the name of Clarke without authorization and Vaughn later comple......
  • State v. Laird
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • November 12, 1957
  • Salsman v. National Community Bank of Rutherford
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court
    • June 7, 1968
    ...might apparently be of legal efficacy. Ibid.; State v. Ruggiero, 43 N.J.Super. 156, 159, 128 A.2d 7 (App.Div.1956), affirmed 25 N.J. 292, 135 A.2d 859 (1957); Annotation, 'Forgery: use of fictitious or assumed name,' 49 A.L.R.2d 852 (1956). Thus, the signature of Breslow as a fictitious tru......
  • State v. Schultz
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • December 2, 1976
    ...some legal effect upon the rights of others * * *' State v. Ruggiero, 43 N.J.Super. 156, 159 (128 A.2d 7) (App.Div.1956), aff'd. o.b. 25 N.J. 292 (1957); State v. Gledhill, --- N.J. --- (dec. June 10, 1975) (67 N.J. 565, 572 (342 A.2d 161)). The gist of the offense is the creation of the ap......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT