State v. Ruiz

Decision Date05 November 2009
Docket NumberNo. 20090559.,20090559.
Citation221 P.3d 837
PartiesSTATE v. RUIZ.
CourtUtah Supreme Court

Appeal from 210 P.3d 955.

Petition for certiorari granted.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Jones & Trevor Marketing Inc. v. Lowry, 2010 UT App 113 (Utah App. 5/6/2010)
    • United States
    • Utah Court of Appeals
    • May 6, 2010
    ... ... because ... the two judges, while different persons, constitute a single judicial office[.]" State v. Ruiz, 2009 UT App 121, ¶ 10, 210 P.3d 955 (citations and internal quotation marks omitted), cert. granted, 221 P.3d 837 (Utah 2009). Therefore, ... ...
  • Robinson v. Baggett
    • United States
    • Utah Court of Appeals
    • August 4, 2011
    ... ... Utah State Bldg. Bd. v. Walsh Plumbing Co., 16 Utah 2d 249, 399 P.2d 141, 144 (1965). Husband has identified only two issues as unresolved: (1) the alimony ... Ruiz, 2009 UT App 121, 10, 210 P.3d 955 ([A] judge can change his or her mind any time up until the entry of final judgment, which is true even if the ... ...
  • State Of Utah v. Jadama
    • United States
    • Utah Court of Appeals
    • April 29, 2010
    ... ... “To prevail on a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel, the defendant has the burden of proving (1) ‘that counsel's performance was deficient’ and (2) that ‘the deficient performance prejudiced the defense.’ ” ... State v. Santana-Ruiz, 2007 UT 59, ¶ 19, 167 P.3d 1038 (quoting ... Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)). Because both elements are required, the lack of either will cause the claim to fail. “In fact, the United States Supreme Court instructed, ‘If it is easier ... ...
2 books & journal articles
  • Utah Standards of Appellate Review - Third Edition
    • United States
    • Utah State Bar Utah Bar Journal No. 23-6, December 2010
    • Invalid date
    ...P.3d 840, cert. granted, 2010 Utah LEXIS 122 (Utah, July 27, 2010); State v. marchet, 2009 UT App 262, ¶ 19, 219 P.3d 75, cert. denied, 221 P.3d 837 (Utah 2009); State v. miller, 2004 UT App 445, ¶ 6, 104 P.3d 1272; Alires, 2000 UT App 244, ¶ 7. (2) Whether a trial court properly excluded i......
  • Utah Standards of Appellate Review - Third Edition
    • United States
    • Utah State Bar Utah Bar Journal No. 23-5, October 2010
    • Invalid date
    ...court properly ordered that a trial should be bifurcated. See Clayton v. Ford Motor Co., 2009 UT App 154, ¶ 9, 214 P.3d 865, cert. denied, 221 P.3d 837. (10) Whether the trial court properly dismissed a case for failure to prosecute. See Gillmor v. Blue Ledge Corp., 2009 UT App 230, ¶ 6, 21......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT