State v. Running Wolf

Docket NumberDA 18-0028
Decision Date04 February 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
16 cases
  • McDonald v. Jacobsen
    • United States
    • Montana Supreme Court
    • August 12, 2022
    ...on justiciability. See State v. Gatts , 279 Mont. 42, 51, 928 P.2d 114, 119 (1996) (discussing importance of stare decisis); State v. Wolf , 2020 MT 24, ¶ 22, 398 Mont. 403, 457 P.3d 218 ("Principles of law should be definitively settled if that is possible," however, prior decisions may be......
  • State v. Gibbons
    • United States
    • Montana Supreme Court
    • March 20, 2024
    ..."Stare decisis is a fundamental doctrine that reflects this Court’s concerns for stability, predictability, and equal treatment." State v. Wolf, 2020 MT 24, ¶ 21, 398 Mont. 403, 457 P.3d 218 (citing Formicove, Inc. v. Burlington N:, Inc., 207 Mont. 189, 194, 673 P.2d 469, 472 (1983)). We ad......
  • State v. Abel
    • United States
    • Montana Supreme Court
    • November 9, 2021
    ...art. II, § 25 "right to appear and defend in person"), overruled on other grounds by State v. Running Wolf, 2020 MT 24, ¶ 29, 398 Mont. 403, 457 P.3d 218; Rock v. Arkansas, 483 U.S. 44, 49-53, 107 S.Ct. 2704, 2708-10 (1987) (right to testify implicit in the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amen......
  • State v. Abel
    • United States
    • Montana Supreme Court
    • November 9, 2021
    ...(right to testify implicit in Mont. Const. art. II, § 25 "right to appear and defend in person"), overruled on other grounds by State v. Running Wolf , 2020 MT 24, ¶ 29, 398 Mont. 403, 457 P.3d 218 ; Rock v. Arkansas , 483 U.S. 44, 49-53, 107 S. Ct. 2704, 2708-10, 97 L.Ed.2d 37 (1987) (righ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT