State v. Sanderson
Decision Date | 12 March 1993 |
Docket Number | No. 91-03055,91-03055 |
Parties | 18 Fla. L. Week. D724 STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Rickey Faye SANDERSON, Respondent. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; James W. Whatley, Judge.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Dale E. Tarpley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for petitioner.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Cecilia A. Traina, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for respondent.
We deny the petition for writ of certiorari. In so doing, we acknowledge conflict with Savory v. State, 600 So.2d 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) and Smith v. State, 589 So.2d 387 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Sanderson
...Cecilia A. Traina, Asst. Public Defender, Tenth Judicial Circuit, Bartow, for respondent. McDONALD, Justice. We review State v. Sanderson, 615 So.2d 275 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993), because of conflict with Savory v. State, 600 So.2d 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), and Smith v. State, 589 So.2d 387 (Fla. 1st......
-
Johnson v. State
...5th DCA 1992); Smith v. State, 589 So.2d 387 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). This court has acknowledged conflict with Smith in State v. Sanderson, 615 So.2d 275 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); however, our conflict with Smith was based on other Affirmed. LEHAN, A.C.J., and PARKER and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur. ...
- State v. Sanderson