State v. Sangor, s. 22, 21.

Decision Date26 January 1938
Docket NumberNos. 22, 21.,s. 22, 21.
Citation119 N.J.L. 429,197 A. 5
PartiesSTATE of New Jersey, Defendant In Error v. Benjamin W. SANGOR, Plaintiff in Error.
CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court

Error to Supreme Court.

Leo Robbins, of Lakewood, for defendant in error. George T. Vickers, of Jersey City, for plaintiff in error.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review hereir should be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court, reportec in State v. Then, 118 N.J.L. 31, 190 A 495.

For affirmance: The CHANCELLOR Justices PARKER, LLOYD, BODINE and DONGES, and Judges DEAR WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, and RAFFERTY —9.

For reversal: None.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • State v. W. U. Tel. Co.
    • United States
    • New Jersey County Court
    • April 2, 1951
  • State v. Zwillman
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • October 19, 1970
  • State v. De Paola
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • May 29, 1950
  • Mitilenes v. Snead
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • June 7, 1957
    ... ... * * * (U)nder the Then case (State v. Then, 118 N.J.L. 31, 190 A. 495 (Sup.Ct.1937), affirmed 119 N.J.L. 429, 196 A. 740 (E. & A.1938)) everything that was said on the point at that ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT