State v. Santiago
| Decision Date | 22 January 2003 |
| Citation | 815 A.2d 673,262 Conn. 939 |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
| Parties | STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. DANIEL SANTIAGO |
James M. Ralls, assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.
Darcy McGraw, special public defender, in opposition.
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 73 Conn. App. 205 (AC 20812), is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the state engaged in prosecutorial misconduct, and that the misconduct deprived the defendant of a fair trial?"
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16918.
To continue reading
Request your trial
10 cases
-
State v. Samuels
...right to a fair trial. See State v. Santiago, 73 Conn. App. 205, 807 A.2d 1048 (2002), cert. granted on other grounds, 262 Conn. 939, 815 A.2d 673 (2003); State v. Alexander, supra, 50 Conn. App. 242; State v. Floyd, supra, 10 Conn. App. 361. "[T]he touchstone of due process analysis in cas......
-
State v. Ross
... ... The first two questions relate to whether a defendant's claim is reviewable, and the last two relate to the substance of the actual review." (Citation omitted; emphasis in original; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Santiago, 73 Conn. App. 205, 212 n.10, 807 A.2d 1048 (2002), cert. granted on other grounds, 262 Conn. 939, 815 A.2d 673 (2003) ... 64 This court in Courchesne specifically reserved the question of whether proof of an aggravated kidnapping or sexual assault followed by an ... ...
-
State v. Spiegelmann
...the cross-examination of the defendant. See State v. Santiago, 73 Conn. App. 205, 224, 807 A.2d 1048 (2002), cert. granted, 262 Conn. 939, 815 A.2d 673 (2003). The present case is distinguishable from Santiago, however, in that the defendant's counsel did not object to the alleged sarcastic......
-
State v. Abrahams
...claim under Golding. See State v. Santiago, 73 Conn. App. 205, 212, 807 A.2d 1048 (2002), cert. granted on other grounds, 262 Conn. 939, 815 A.2d 673 (2003). "To prove prosecutorial misconduct, the defendant must demonstrate substantial prejudice.... In order to demonstrate this, the defend......
Request a trial to view additional results