State v. Saunders

• Decision Date: 21 June 1976
• Citation: 142 N.J.Super. 287,361 A.2d 111
• Parties: STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Charles SAUNDERS, Defendant-Appellant.
• Court: New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division

Page 287

142 N.J.Super. 287

361 A.2d 111

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Charles SAUNDERS, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued June 14, 1976.

Decided June 21, 1976.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, whose opinion is reported at 130 N.J.Super. 234, 326 A.2d 84 (Law Div.1974).

Alan Silber, East Orange, for defendant-appellant (Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney; Robert A. Baime, Irvington, of counsel).

Roy B. Greenman, Asst. Prosecutor, for plaintiff-respondent (Joseph P. Lordi, Prosecutor of Essex County, attorney).

Before Judges KOLE, ARD and COLLESTER.

PER CURIAM.

The conviction of defendant is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Bedford. Cf. Doe v. Commonwealth's Attorney for City of Richmond, D.C., 403 F.Supp. 1199, aff'd 425 U.S. 901, 96 S.Ct. 1489, 47 L.Ed.2d 751 (1976).

Affirmed.