State v. Schaffer

Decision Date08 November 1887
Citation50 N.J.E. 72,11 A. 154
PartiesSTATE (METROPOLITAN LIFE INS. CO., Prosecutor) v. SCHAFFER.
CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court

(Syllabus by the Court.)

On certiorari from common pleas, Essex county; KIRKPATRICK, JOHNSON, and LEDWITH, Judges, affirming judgment of Second district court of Newark, HENRY, Judge.

J. A. Beecher and Thos. N. McCarter, for plaintiff. Theo. L. Currie, for defendant.

VAN SYCKEL, J. This action is brought upon a policy of life insurance issued under a system known as "Industrial Insurance." The policy was issued in pursuance of a written application by the insured. The plaintiff below is the person named in answer to question 9 in said application. "Question. Name and relation of person to whom benefit is to be paid? Answer. [Name] Frederick Schaffer; [relation] son."

The policy refers to the said application, and makes it part of the contract, and recites that in consideration of the payment of the premium agreed upon, and of a like weekly premium to be paid on every subsequent Monday during the life of the insured, the said company doth agree to pay to the person or persons designated in condition 5 of said policy, upon receipt of proofs satisfactory to said company of the death of said insured, the sum of money stipulated to be paid; and that said policy is issued and accepted upon the following conditions therein set forth, the fifth of which is as follows: "The production by the company of this policy, and of a receipt for the sum assured, signed by any person furnishing proof satisfactory to the company that he or she is the beneficiary, or an executor or administrator, husband or wife, or relative by blood, or connection by marriage, of the assured, shall be conclusive evidence that such sum has been paid to and received by the person or persons lawfully entitled to the same, and that all claims and demands upon said company under this policy have been fully satisfied." The fourth condition provides that the policy and receipt-book must be surrendered to the company before any payment can be claimed.

The insured died on the fourteenth of August, 1885. On the twenty-fourth of August, 1885, Annie Hageman, the daughter of the assured, produced to the company the policy, and the premium receipt-book, and the company paid her the amount of the insurance, ($93,) and thereupon she signed a receipt releasing and discharging the company, and at the same time surrendered the policy and receipt-book. It does not appear that the plaintiff ever had possession either of the policy or the premium receipt-book, or that he ever knew of the existence of the policy, until after the death of the assured. The company, in its defense below, produced the policy, the premium receipt-book, and the receipt of Annie Hageman, and made...

To continue reading

Request your trial
23 cases
  • Clarkston v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 4 Mayo 1915
    ... ... 655; Pfaff v. Ins. Co., 141 Pa. 562; ... Brennan v. Ins. Co., 170 Pa. 488; Ins. Co. v ... O'Farrell, 64 Kan. 278; Ins. Co. v ... Schaffer, 50 N.J. L. 72; Brooks v. Ins. Co., 70 N.J. L ...          NORTONI, ... J. Reynolds, P. J., and Allen, J., concur ... it is said, was designated beneficiary in the policy. In ... order to determine this question, it is essential to state ... additional facts and consider, too, the provisions of the ...          Plaintiff, ... Edward Clarkston, is an infant son of the ... ...
  • Kelly v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 19 Abril 1910
    ...v. Prudential Insurance Co., 72 Mo.App. 455; Thomas v. Prudential, 158 Ind. 463; Susquehanna v. Swank, 102 Pa. St. 17; Metropolitan v. Shafer, 50 N. J. Law 72 (11 A. 154); Metropolitan v. O'Farrer (Kas.), 67 P. Ruoff v. Hancock, 86 A.D. 447; Pfaff v. Prudential, 141 Pa. St. 562; Brennan v. ......
  • McAlpine v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • 28 Julio 1916
    ... ... follows, is applicable: ...           ... "In any claim upon a policy issued in this state without ... previous medical examination, or without the knowledge or ... consent of the insured, or, in case of a minor, without the ... consent ... Ins. Co. 23 A.D. 53, 48 N.Y.S. 548; Home Friendly ... Society v. Roberson, 100 Md. 85, 59 A. 279; ... Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Schaffer, 50 N.J. Law, ... 72, 11 A. 154; Jones v. Prudential Ins. Co. 173 ... Mo.App. 1, 155 S.W. 11; Burke v. Prudential Ins. Co ... 221 Mass. 253, ... ...
  • Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Bates
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 27 Noviembre 1922
    ... ... (N ... J.), 56 A. 168; 32 A. 1042, 63 N.E. 795. [130 Miss. 401] ... It is ... held in the case of Insurance Co. v. Schaffer (N ... J.), 11 A. 154, that there was no contract or agreement ... to pay to the beneficiary named in the application. The ... contract is to pay ... and paid as provided by the clause supra would ... foster rather than impair the public policy of the ... In ... State Metropolitan L. Ins. Co., Prosecutor ... v. Schaffer, 50 N.J.L. 72, 11 A. 154, the court had ... under consideration a clause similar to the one ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT