State v. Scheidell

• Decision Date: 22 October 1999
• Citation: 601 N.W.2d 284
• Parties: (Wis. 1999) NOTICE: This opinion is subject to further editing and modification. The final version will appear in the bound volume of the official reports. State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Daniel G. Scheidell, Defendant-Appellant. Case No.: 97-1426-CR Submitted on Briefs: Oral Argument: Opinion Filed:
• Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court

601 N.W.2d 284 (Wis. 1999)

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to further editing and modification. The final version will appear in the bound volume of the official reports.

State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Daniel G. Scheidell, Defendant-Appellant.

Case No.: 97-1426-CR

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN

Submitted on Briefs: Oral Argument:

Opinion Filed: October 22, 1999

ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

Source of APPEAL

COURT:

COUNTY:

JUDGE:

JUSTICES: Concurred:

Dissented: Not Participating:

SYKES, J., did not participate

ATTORNEYS:

¶1. PER CURIAM.

Defendant-Appellant Daniel G. Scheidell moves for reconsideration of our decision in State v. Scheidell, 227 Wis. 2d 285, 595 N.W.2d 661 (1999), on grounds that this court declined to review an issue concerning the circuit court's refusal to admit comparative handprint evidence offered by the defendant.

¶2. In the exercise of judicial discretion, we have carefully considered the circuit court's ruling on the hand print evidence. We agree with the court of appeals that the circuit court "correctly exercised its discretion in refusing to admit Scheidell's exhibit." State v. Scheidell, 220 Wis. 2d 753, 774, 584 N.W.2d 897 (Ct. App. 1998).

¶3. The motion for reconsideration is denied without costs.

¶4. DIANE S. SYKES, J., did not participate.