State v. Seals

Decision Date10 June 1861
PartiesThe State v. Seals
CourtIndiana Supreme Court

APPEAL from the Posey Circuit Court.

The appeal is dismissed.

Conrad Baker, James M. Shanklin and J. G. Jones, Attorney General, for the State.

Alvin P. Hovey, for the appellee.

OPINION

Per Curiam.

This case is appealed by the State to obtain a decision upon a question of law. That question is, can the admission of the defendant, on a trial for bigamy, be given in evidence to prove his marriage? The authorities are conflicting upon the point, but the preponderance is in favor of the admission of such evidence. 2 Phil. on Ev., by Cow. & Hill, 4 Am. Ed. p. 279, n. And we think reason lies on the same side. And the evidence being admissible, it follows that the jury may convict upon it. See the cases cited in the Ind. Dig., p. 10, under the head of Accomplice.

The appeal is dismissed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • State v. Hughes
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • October 7, 1886
    ... ... Hilton, 3 Rich ... 434; Murtagh's Case, 1 Ash. 272; Forney v ... Hallacher, 8 Serge. & Rawle 159; The State v ... Britton, 4 McCord 256; Williams v. The State, ... 54 Ala. 131; Halbrook v. The State, 34 Ark. 511; ... Oneale v. Commonwealth, 17 Gratt. 582; The State ... v. Seals, 16 Ind. 352; Finney v. The State, 3 ... Head 544; The State v. Libby, 44 Me. 469; ... Jackson v. The People, 2 Scam. 231; Commonwealth ... v. Henning, 10 Phila. 209; West v. The State, 1 ... Wis. 209; Miles v. United States, 103 U.S. 304, 26 ... L.Ed. 481.) ... About ... the ... ...
  • State v. Wylde
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • April 29, 1892
    ...Com. v. Murtagh. l Ashm. 272; Reg. v. Newton, 2 Moody & R. 503; State v. McDonald, 25 Mo. 176; Wolverton v. State, 16 Ohio, 173; State v. Seals, 16 Ind. 352; Squire v. State, 46 Ind. 459; Arnold v. State, 53 Ga. 574; Cameron v. State, 14 Ala. 546; Brown v. State, 52 Ala. 338; Williams v. St......
  • Pearman v. State
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • November 3, 1986
    ...prosecutions, the admissions of the defendant are competent to prove his prior marriage. Squire v. State (1874), 46 Ind. 459; State v. Seals (1861), 16 Ind. 352. Thus, the statements of Pearman to the officers that he was married to Barbara were competent proof of their marriage. Id. Pearma......
  • Miles v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • October 1, 1880
    ... ...           '2. For the existence of a state of mind on the part of the juror which leads to a just inference, in reference to the case, that he will not act with entire impartiality, ... (Pa.) 272; Regina v. Newton , 2 Moo. & R. 503; State v. McDonald , 25 Miss. 176; Wolverton v. State , 16 Ohio, 173; State v. Seals , ... Page 312 ... 16 Ind. 352; Quin v. State , 46 id. 725; Arnold v. State , 53 Ga. 574; Cameron v. State , 14 Ala. 546; Brown v ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT