State v. Serrano
Decision Date | 13 July 1964 |
Docket Number | No. 7426,7426 |
Citation | 1964 NMSC 161,394 P.2d 262,74 N.M. 412 |
Parties | STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard SERRANO, Defendant-Appellant. |
Court | New Mexico Supreme Court |
Hart & Brockman, Tucumcari, for appellant.
Earl E. Hartley, Atty. Gen., George Richard Schmitt, James E. Snead, Asst. Attys. Gen., Santa Fe, for appellee.
This is an appeal from a conviction under Sec. 40-1-6, N.M.S.A.1953.
'Any person who shall attempt to commit any felony that shall fail in being committed, the punishment for which attempt is not otherwise prescribed by law, shall upon conviction thereof, be punished by imprisonment for not more than three (3) years nor less than six (6) months, or by fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000.00), or by both such fine and imprisonment at the discretion of the court trying the cause.'
Under points I and II defendant contends that an information charging 'Attempting to break and enter the Westside Grocery in the nighttime with the intent to take property therefrom on or about April 27, 1963, contrary to 40-1-6, NMSA' fails to allege a felony offense. Defendant further contends that larceny of property over the value of $50.00 is an essential element of proof in a charge of attempting to commit an offense under Sec. 40-9-6, N.M.S.A.1953.
'Every person who shall break and enter, in the night-time, any office, shop, or warehouse, not adjoining to nor occupied as a dwelling-house, with the intent to commit the crime of murder, rape, robbery, larceny, or any other felony, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state penitentiary not more than three years nor less than one year.'
From an examination of the foregoing statutory sections the requirement for a conviction for an attempted felony demands that the attempt must be to commit a felony as described in Sec. 40-9-6, supra, i. e., murder, rape, robbery, larceny, or any other felony. The offense must be a felony. To attempt to commit a felony is a felony; however, to attempt to commit a misdemeanor is not a felony. The attempted offense alleged herein is breaking and entering into places other than dwellings with the intent to commit larceny therein.
The parties agree that Sec. 40-9-6, supra, does not define the term 'larceny' used therein. Defendant suggests that the meaning to be assigned to the term 'larceny' is 'grand larceny' as defined in Sec. 40-45-2, N.M.S.A.1953:
'Every person who shall commit the crime of larceny, by stealing of the property of another any money, goods or chattels, or any bank note, bond, promissory note, bill of exchange, or other bill, order or certificate, or any books of accounts for or concerning money or goods, due or to become due, or to be delivered, or any deed of writing, containing a conveyance of land or any other valuable contract in force, or any writ, process or public record, if the property stolen shall exceed the value of fifty dollars [$50.00], shall be punished as provided in section 41-5401 [40-45-1]. * * *'
The answer is set forth in Secs. 40-45-6 and 40-45-7, N.M.S.A.1953:
Stealing property of any value is, under one or the other of the sections, a felony. Therefore, the requirement of value in the information charged in this case need not be specified and we hold that the term 'larceny' as used in Sec. 40-9-6, supra, is not limited to 'grand larceny' as defined in Sec. 40-45-2, supra, and the value of over $50.00 is not an essential element of proof in a charge of attempting to commit an offense under Secs. 40-1-6 and 40-9-6, supra.
With this determination under point III, we hold that the court did not err in giving the following instructions:
Defendant's final point is that the court erred in overruling ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Sanchez
...Circumstantial evidence is evidence that proves a fact from which one may infer the existence of another fact. State v. Serrano, 74 N.M. 412, 394 P.2d 262 (1964); N.M.U.J.I.Crim. 40.00, N.M.S.A.1978. Circumstantial evidence may be used to establish an element of a crime. State v. Ramirez, 8......
-
State v. Gunzelman
...substantially follow the language of the statute are sufficient. (Citation omitted.)' (Emphasis added.) This Court, in State v. Serrano, 74 N.M. 412, 394 P.2d 262 (1964), approved instructions which conformed to the requirements of the statute under which the defendant was being The Court o......
-
State v. Johnson
...at a verdict. See State v. Sharp, 78 N.M. 220, 430 P.2d 378 (1967); State v. Roybal, 76 N.M. 337, 414 P.2d 850 (1966); State v. Serrano, 74 N.M. 412, 394 P.2d 262 (1964); State v. Ocanas, 61 N.M. 484, 303 P.2d 390 We must recognize the fact that an offense, like this one, can rarely be prov......
-
State v. Lujan
...inference of defendant's intent to commit a theft in the school house which he had entered without authorization. State v. Serrano, 74 N.M. 412, 394 P.2d 262 (1964). Defendant would have us the present case from the Serrano case in that in the Serrano case the building entered was a store, ......