State v. Sharpfish

Docket Number28705
Decision Date14 August 2019

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • State v. Rosa
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • December 14, 2022
    ... ... [¶18.] "Investigatory stops may be based on information provided by informants. However, ‘[t]he requirement that an officer have reasonable suspicion prior to a stop is not abrogated simply because a third-party informant is convinced a crime occurred.’ " State v. Sharpfish , 2019 S.D. 49, ¶ 26, 933 N.W.2d 1, 10 (alteration in original) (quoting Stanage , 2017 S.D. 12, ¶ 10, 893 N.W.2d at 526 ). " ‘The "reasonable suspicion" necessary to justify such a stop "is dependent upon both the content of information possessed by police and its degree of reliability[ ]" ’ ... ...
  • State v. Ostby, #29205
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • November 4, 2020
    ... ... Sharpfish, wherein this Court, in discussing reasonable suspicion, stated that when an unknown informant does not give "explicit and detailed description of alleged wrongdoing," ... "[t]he officer must confirm the tip through personal observations of criminal activity, or in the alternative, be aware that ... ...
  • State v. Edelman
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • February 2, 2022
    ... ... "The Supreme Court shall have such appellate ... jurisdiction as may be provided by the Legislature[.]" ... S.D. Const. art. V, § 5. "The right to appeal is ... statutory and therefore does not exist in the absence of a ... statute permitting it." ... State v. Sharpfish, 2019 S.D. 49, ¶ 12, 933 ... N.W.2d 1, 7 (citation omitted). Chapter 23A-32 provides this ... Court with jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a criminal ... defendant in three instances. See State v. Kaufman, ... 2016 S.D. 24, ¶ 8, 877 N.W.2d 590, 591-92 (describing ... the three statutes ... ...