State v. Shepherd
Decision Date | 05 October 1889 |
Parties | THE STATE OF KANSAS, on the relation of L. B. Kellogg, Attorney General, v. CARRIE SHEPHERD, as City Clerk of Leavenworth |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Decided July, 1889.
Original Proceeding in Mandamus.THE opinion, filed October 5, 1889, states the case.
Writ of mandamus refused.
L. B Kellogg, attorney general, for The State.
Thos P. Fenlon, for respondent.
OPINION
On March 2, 1889, an act of the legislature relating to the registration of voters, etc., in certain cities of the first class, was passed, and on March 13, 1889, the act took effect. The title to the act reads as follows:
"An act to provide for and regulate the registration of voters; to regulate elections, and to provide for the appointment of a commissioner of elections in certain cities of the first class." The remainder of the act, so far as it is necessary to quote the same, reads as follows:
etc.
etc.
At the time of the passage and the taking effect of this act the city of Leavenworth was, and still is, a city of the first class, in which the metropolitan-police law was and still is in force. At the general election held in November, 1888 less than 6,000 votes were cast in said city, but at the city election held in April, 1889, more than 6,000 votes were cast in said city, to wit, 7,439, of which 3,000 were cast by women. On April 10, 1889, the governor, under the aforesaid act, appointed William W. Roberts, a citizen and householder of Leavenworth city, a commissioner of elections for the city, and he duly accepted the office and qualified. At that time and since, the defendant, Carrie Shepherd, was and has been the city clerk of said city. On April 24, 1889, Roberts, as such commissioner, demanded of the defendant, as city clerk, the entries of registration made by the clerk since the first Monday in January, 1889, and...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kerlin v. City of Devils Lake
... ... exceeding" and "not to exceed," referring to ... the amount of the bond, and neither is sufficiently definite ... Ibid.; State ex rel. Schultze v. Manchester Twp ... Committee, 61 N.J.L. 513, 40 A. 589; State ex rel ... Lexington & St. L. R. Co. v. Saline County Ct. 45 ... Dec. 451; People v. McManus, 34 Barb ... 625, 22 How. Pr. 27; People ex rel. Lefever v. Ulster ... County, 34 N.Y. 273; Hannah v. Shepherd, Tex. Civ ... App. , 25 S.W. 137; Soper v. Sibley County, 46 ... Minn. 274, 48 N.W. 1112; Howser v. Pepper, 8 N.D ... 484, 79 N.W. 1018; ... ...
-
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad Co. v. Hawkins
... ... plaintiff complains of the defendant, and alleges that ... defendant is a corporation duly organized under the laws of ... the state of Kansas, and that it owns and operates a line of ... railroad through the county of Harvey, in said state, and did ... at all of the times herein ... ...