State v. Shott, 37456
| Decision Date | 27 June 1962 |
| Docket Number | No. 37456,37456 |
| Parties | , 20 O.O.2d 155 The STATE of Ohio, Appellee, v. SHOTT, Jr., Appellant. |
| Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County.
James G. Andrews, Jr., and John A. Lloyd, Jr., Cincinnati, for appellant.
C. Watson Hover, Pros. Atty., Harry C. Schoettmer and Calvin W. Prem, Cincinnati, for appellee.
The appeal as of right herein is dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
KERNS, J., of the Second Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of HERBERT, J.
To continue reading
Request your trial
5 cases
-
Tehan v. United States Shott
...judgment of conviction was affirmed by an Ohio court of appeals, and the Supreme Court of Ohio declined further review. State v. Shott, 173 Ohio St. 542, 184 N.E.2d 213. The respondent then brought his case to this Court, claiming several constitutional errors but not attacking the Ohio com......
-
United States v. Tarrago, 196
...Mishkin, 33 U.Chi.L.Rev. 719, 733 n. 68. Immediately following the affirmance of his conviction by the Ohio Supreme Court, State v. Shott, 173 Ohio St. 542, 184 N. E.2d 213 (1962), Shott sought Supreme Court review on appeal and certiorari, raising the same issue upon which the Court grante......
-
Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Shott
...by the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, and, upon appeal to this court, the appeal as of right was dismissed, State v. Shott, 173 Ohio St. 542, 184 N.E.2d 213. Upon appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States, the appeal was dismissed and certiorari denied on May 13, 1965, Shott v......
-
Guardianship of Breece, In re
... ... to law, there being no evidence or insufficient evidence to sustain the judgment * * * the state of the evidence being such that reasonable minds could reach but one conclusion.' The second error ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results