State v. Shryack
Decision Date | 10 February 1904 |
Citation | 179 Mo. 424,78 S.W. 808 |
Parties | STATE ex rel. MILLER, Collector, v. SHRYACK. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
1. Laws 1866, p. 134, c. 2, § 27, provided that persons owning stock in corporations should not be required to deliver to the assessor a list thereof, but the president thereof should deliver to the assessor a list of all the shareholders. Section 28 required the corporation to pay the tax assessed against the shareholders. Laws 1871-72, p. 90, § 35, modified section 27 so as to provide that the property of corporations should be assessed as the property of individuals, and to require the president of the corporation, in making the list of the shareholders, to state the actual cash value of the stock and property of the corporation, which value should be assessed as personal property. Act April 1, 1891 (Laws 1891, p. 195), modified section 35, and required the value of the real estate and fixtures to be deducted from the estimate of the value of the stock, and made the real estate and fixtures taxable against the corporation direct, and permitted the stockholders to show any impairment of the value of the stock. Act April 9, 1895 (Laws 1895, p. 242), modified the preceding provisions by providing that the property of corporations should be assessed and taxed in their corporate names, by requiring the president of the corporation to merely furnish to the assessor a list of all shares of stock therein, and by making the value of the real estate only taxable against the corporation. Held, that under the law of 1895 the real estate of banking companies must be assessed against the corporation, the personal property must not be assessed at all, and the shares of stock must be assessed in the names of the shareholders.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Johnson County; Wm. L. Jarrott, Judge.
Action by the state, on the relation of Franklin Miller, collector of Johnson county, against M. C. Shryack. From a voluntary nonsuit taken on the court sustaining a demurrer to the evidence, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
J. W. Suddath, for appellant. Jas. A. Kemper, for respondent.
This is an action, under section 987, Rev. St. 1899, by the collector of Johnson county, to collect from the defendant, as a stockholder, director, and trustee in liquidation of the Farmers' & Merchants' Bank of Warrensburg, the sum of $385.11, the taxes for 1899, that were assessed against the bank. After the usual and necessary averments in ordinary tax cases, the petition alleges that on April 24, 1899, the bank dissolved, leaving these taxes unpaid, and that the defendant was a director and a stockholder, owning 10 shares, of the par value of $100 each, and that he received $1,000 as his share of the capital stock upon the dissolution, and that, as such stockholder and trustee, the sum of $30,000 of the money of the bank passed through his hands to the stockholders, and hence, under the statute, he is liable for these taxes. The answer admits that the bank was a corporation organized under the laws of this state, and that the defendant was a director and stockholder, as charged, and then denies generally the other allegations in the petition. Upon the trial the plaintiff introduced the back tax bill, which was as follows:
The case was tried upon the following agreed statement of facts:
The defendant demurred to the evidence; the court sustained the demurrer; the plaintiff took a nonsuit, with leave, and, after proper steps, appealed to this court.
Counsel for defendant says that the case "was and is defended upon the theory that an assessment of the shares of stock cannot be made against the bank in which they are held, for the reason that they are not the property of the bank, but belong to the individual shareholders." The assessment in this case is not preserved in the record. The back tax bill, however, recites that it is for taxes "on the personal property assessed against and in the name of Farmers' & Merchants' Bank." And the petition alleges that "there were assessed and levied upon the moneys, capital stock, furniture and fixtures, and personal property, of said Farmers' & Merchants' Bank," etc., the taxes sued for. It is apparent, therefore, that the assessment and levy was direct upon the money, capital stock, and personal property of the bank, in the name of the bank, and not upon the shares of stock of the bank in the names of the stockholders. The question, therefore, is whether such an assessment and levy is valid under the laws of this state. A brief review of the development of the law in this state as to the taxation of property owned by banks and other corporations will serve to explain the law as it now stands upon the statutes of this state.
By sections 27 and 28 of chapter 2, p. 134, Laws 1866 (Sess. Acts Adj. Sess. 1865), it was provided as follows:
These sections were a part of the act approved March 19, 1866, which revised the whole revenue laws of the state. The law remained the same until the act approved March 30, 1872 (Laws 1871-72, pp. 80 to 137), was enacted. That act also revised the revenue laws of the state. Section 27 of the act of 1866 was omitted, and section 35, p. 90, was enacted in lieu thereof, as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. to Use of Bay v. Citizens State Bank
...the bank to pay the tax, nor in holding it liable therefor, in case of its neglect or refusal to pay the same. In State ex rel. v. Shryack, 179 Mo. 424, 78 S.W. 808, said: "After the assessment is thus made against the shares of stock in the names of the shareholders, it is legal to make th......
-
The State ex rel. Campbell v. Brinkop
... ... 421; Lionberger v ... Rowse, 43 Mo. 67; Ins. Co. v. Charles, 47 Mo ... 373; State ex rel. v. Board of Assessors, 56 Mo ... 503; Springfield v. Bank, 87 Mo. 441; State ex ... rel. v. Catron, 118 Mo. 280; State ex rel. v ... Bank, 160 Mo. 640; State ex rel. v. Shryack, ... 179 Mo. 424; State ex rel. v. Bank, 180 Mo. 717; ... State ex rel. v. Bank, 196 Mo. 516. (2) In ... determining the value of the shares there must be considered ... all the property of the corporation except its real estate, ... legal reserve and unpaid policy claims. R. S. 1909, ... ...
-
The State ex rel. Koeln v. Lesser
... ... to its real value, which includes in its estimate the ... non-taxable bonds, and the General Assembly, to avail itself ... of that act, put state banks and insurance companies on a ... plain with national banks. [State ex rel. v. Shryack, 179 Mo ... 424, 78 S.W. 808.] The peculiar character of steamboats, here ... to-day and beyond reach to-morrow, is the reason for ... requiring the resident owner of such stock to include it in ... his list to be returned to the assessor, and the peculiar ... nature of interests in building ... ...
-
State ex rel. and to Use of Wyatt v. Cantley
...creditors of the banking corporation. Springfield v. National Bank, 87 Mo. 445; State ex rel. v. Catron, 118 Mo. 285; State ex rel. Miller v. Shryack, 179 Mo. 441; State ex rel. v. Citizens Bank, 274 Mo. 68. Agency on the part of the banking corporation in the matter of payment of the perso......