State v. Silver, 30187
Decision Date | 28 May 1962 |
Docket Number | No. 30187,30187 |
Citation | 243 Ind. 67,182 N.E.2d 587 |
Parties | STATE of Indiana, Appellant, v. Sol SILVER, Appellee. |
Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
Edwin K. Steers, Atty. Gen., Carl E. Van Dorn, Deputy Atty Gen., Indianapolis, O. H. Roberts, Jr., Pros. Atty., First Judicial Circuit, Evansville, for appellant.
Milford M. Miller, W. C. Welborn, Evansville, for appellee.
The appellee herein was charged by a second amended affidavit in four counts with embezzlement. The four counts were worded the same, with the exception that the amount involved and the dae of the alleged crime varied as to each count. For the purposes of this opinion we need set out the wording of only Count One, which (omitting the caption and signature) is as follows:
'Then and there being contrary to the form of the Statute, in such cases made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the State of Indiana.' (Our italics.)
The trial court sustained a motion to quash all four counts. There are certain technical questions raised with reference to the procedure in this appeal, to which we need not give consideration for the reason that the same may be easily remedied and would only delay a consideration of this case upon its merits.
Upon the sustaining of the motion to quash the State refused to plead further and an appeal on the sustaining of the motion to quash is presented to this court. The gist of the motion is that the words 'money aforesaid' used in the latter part of the count are too indefinite and uncertain as to whether they refer to 'current money' or 'funds'...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Moles
...is provided by statute that the State has a right to make this election. IC 1971, 35--1--47--2 (Burns Code Ed.). See State v. Silver (1962), 243 Ind. 67, 182 N.E.2d 587. If an indictment is good, the State is not required to make it better. If we were to hold that the delay caused by filing......
-
State v. McCarty
...in the interim preceding the filing of an amended information as provided by statute. Our attention is also directed to State v. Silver (1962), Ind., 182 N.E.2d 587, 588, where this court held that an order sustained a motion to quash would be considered as a final judgment on appeal by the......
-
State v. Flater
...a ruling sustaining a motion to quash the affidavit. State v. Leed (1962), 243 Ind. 402, 183 N.E.2d 607, 186 N.E.2d 5; State v. Silver (1962), 243 Ind. 67, 182 N.E.2d 587. See also, State v. Allen (1883), 94 Ind. 441; State v. Swope (1863), 20 Ind. 106. In these cases the court has reasoned......
-
State v. Leed, 30236
...not therefore be sustained.' To the same effect is The State v. Swope (1863), 20 Ind. 106. More recently, in the case of State v. Sol Silver, Ind., 182 N.E.2d 587, the same question arose, and we there 'There are certain technical questions raised with reference to the procedure in this app......