State v. Simons

Decision Date18 April 1906
Citation145 Ala. 95,40 So. 662
PartiesSTATE v. SIMONS.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Appeal from Tuscaloosa County Court; H. B. Foster, Judge.

"To be officially reported."

Habeas corpus, on petition of F. F. Simons. From an order discharging petitioner from custody, the state appeals. Affirmed.

C. B Verner, M. T. Ormond, Daniel Collier, and W. T. McCrossin for the State.

Fitts &amp Fitts, for appellee.

DOWDELL J.

The appellee was arrested and imprisoned on a charge of trespass after warning, and on a writ of habeas corpus was discharged from such imprisonment. From the order or judgment discharging the appellee, the state prosecutes this appeal.

The judge of the county court of Tuscaloosa, before whom the proceedings on habeas corpus were had, adjourned the hearing from the 27th day of October to the 30th, during which time he admitted the appellee to bail. This the judge was authorized to do, under section 4832 of the Code of 1896.

The offense of trespass after warning is a statutory offense. Code 1896, § 5606. The statute provides that "any person, who, without legal cause or good excuse, enters into the dwelling house, or on the premises of another, after having been warned, within six months preceding, not to do so," etc. If a legal cause or good excuse exists for entering on the premises, certainly the statute is not violated. There can be no doubt that it is within legislative competency to say what shall constitute a "legal cause or good excuse." The undisputed evidence showed that the appellee, Simons, was a civil engineer in the employment of the Pensacola, Alabama & Western Railway Company of Alabama a corporation organized under the general statutes approved October 2, 1903 (Gen. Acts 1903, p. 310), and as such under the directions of said company entered upon the premises in question solely for the purpose of making a preliminary survey of the proposed route or line of railway of said railway company. Section 9, p. 320, of the above act, for the purpose mentioned, authorizes an entry upon the premises of another, "but subject to liability for all damages done thereto." This authorization of the statute furnished to the appellee, in entering upon the premises for the purpose of making an examination and survey of the proposed line of railroad, "a legal cause and good excuse" as against a criminal prosecution under the statute. Code 1896, § 5606, for trespass after warning.

The...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Lamont v. Marbury Lumber Co.
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 14 Mayo 1914
    ... ... wit: That, plaintiff being the owner and in possession of a ... certain house on her tract of land, in said state and county ... consisting of the N.W. 1/4 of section 19, and the W. 1/2 of ... the N.W. 1/4 section 20, township 20, range 16, the said ... liability for a trespass, according with the largely ... analogous right of temporary entry treated in State v ... Simons, 145 Ala. 95, 40 So. 662. It is not to be ... supposed that the preservative right established by the ... statute under view was only intended to ... ...
  • Mackie v. Mayor and Com'rs of Town of Elkton, 306
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • 10 Mayo 1972
    ...proposed by the appellees. The cases, for the most part, have upheld statutes similar to the 1916 law. See, e. g., State v. Simons, 145 Ala. 95, 40 So. 662 (1906); Jacobsen v. Superior Court of Sonoma County, 192 Cal. 319, 219 P. 986 (1923); Cushman v. Smith, 34 Me. 247 (1852); Wood v. Miss......
  • Wood v. Mississippi Power Co., 42397
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 12 Noviembre 1962
    ...of judicial opinion that the legislature has such power, and numerous cases are cited to support that statement. In State v. Simons (1906), 145 Ala. 95, 40 So. 662, the Court sustained the validity of a statute authorizing certain classes of companies to enter upon premises for the purposes......
  • Birmingham-Trussville Iron Co. v. Allied Engineers, Inc.
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 6 Octubre 1932
    ... ... the Alabama Power Company, a power corporation organized and ... existing under the laws of the state of Alabama, and having ... the right and power as such corporation, to acquire by ... condemnation land, found it necessary or expedient to ... 622, 650, 65 So. 287, 295, of this ... statute it was said: 'The temporary right, and consequent ... limited immunity (State v. Simons, 145 Ala. 95, 40 ... So. 662), conferred by this statute, is necessarily incident ... to, and preliminary of, authorized proceedings to condemn, ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT