State v. Singer
| Decision Date | 22 March 1906 |
| Citation | State v. Singer, 101 Me. 299, 64 A. 586 (Me. 1906) |
| Parties | STATE v. SINGER. |
| Court | Maine Supreme Court |
Exceptions from Supreme Judicial Court, Lincoln County.
George W. Singer was indicted for libel From an order overruling a demurrer, he brings exceptions. Exceptions sustained.
The defendant was indicted for libel at the April term, 1905, of the Supreme Judicial Court, Lincoln county. The indictment charged that the defendant "did willfully and maliciously libel and defame one Nathaniel J. Hanna, of Bristol in said county of Lincoln, then a deputy sheriff within and for said county of Lincoln, specially charged with the enforcement of the prohibitory law within said county of Lincoln, and also a fish warden, specially charged with the enforcement of the laws relating to sea and shore fisheries, by printing and publishing, or causing to be printed and published, in a newspaper called 'The Damariscotta Herald,' a newspaper printed and published in said Damariscotta and of which the said George W. Singer was then and there printer and publisher, with the intent then and there to provoke the said Nathaniel J. Hanna to wrath, expose him to public hatred, contempt, and ridicule, and to deprive him in his said capacities of deputy sheriff and fish warden, of public confidence," a certain libellous and defamatory statement. To this indictment the defendant filed a general demurrer. The presiding justice before whom hearing on the demurrer was had overruled the demurrer and adjudged the indictment good. Thereupon the defendant excepted and exceptions were allowed "with the right of the respondent to plead over."
The form of charging in the indictment was on the disjunctive, and this is the only point considered by the law court.
Argued before WISWELL, C. J., and EMERY, WHITEHOUSE, SAVAGE, and SPEAR, JJ.
Weston M. Hilton, Co. Atty. for the State, Wm. Henry Hilton, for defendant
SAVAGE, J. Demurrer to indictment for libel. It is claimed that the indictment is faulty in several particulars, only one of which do we have any occasion to notice.
The indictment charges that the defendant "did willfully and maliciously libel and defame one Nathaniel J. Hanna * * * by printing and publishing, or causing to be printed and published, in a newspaper" a certain libellous and defamatory statement we think this form of charging in the disjunctive is fatal.
"It is an established rule" says Bishop, following Chitty, "in respect to the statement of the offense in the indictment...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Moulton v. Scully
...he again be prosecuted for the same offense he may plead the former conviction or acquittal in bar." To the same effect is State v. Singer, 101 Me. 299, 64 Atl. 586. The crime attempted to be set forth in the resolve is not one that consists of a series of acts that need not be particularly......
-
State v. Morrow
... ... further prosecution based upon the same facts. United ... States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542, 23 L.Ed. 588; ... Brockway v. State, 192 Ind. 656, 138 N.E ... 88, 26 A. L. R. 1338; State v. Pirlot, 19 ... R.I. 695, 36 A. 715; State v. Singer, 101 ... Me. 299, 64 A. 586; State v. Villa, 92 Vt ... 121, 102 A. 935; State v. Nutwell, (Md.) 1 ... Gill 54; Sherban v. Commonwealth, 8 ... Watts. (Pa.) 212, 34 Am. Dec. 460; ... People v. Malley, 49 Cal. App. 597, 194 ... The ... Constitution of this State at Section 7 of ... ...
-
Woodbury v. Yeaton
...a case within the terms of the statute, and this she has not done." In a criminal action for libel, the court held in State v. Singer, 101 Me. 299, 64 A. 586, 587: "It is elemental knowledge that all essential matters must be alleged with certainty that the defendant may be apprised of the ......
-
Young v. Aetna Ins. Co.
... ... I have no doubt whatever but there are just as good men in Calais as in any other part of the state, but inasmuch as the insurance people whom I represent object to local man, ... I deem it advisable to select third referee from some other part of ... ...