State v. Singleton

Decision Date11 July 1947
Docket Number970
Citation66 Ariz. 49,182 P.2d 920
PartiesSTATE v. SINGLETON
CourtArizona Supreme Court

Appeal from Superior Court, Coconino County; Dudley W. Windes Judge.

Henry Singleton was convicted of second-degree murder and of manslaughter, and he appeals.

Judgments of conviction reversed and cause remanded for a new trial.

H. K Mangum, of Flagstaff, and Dodd L. Greer, of Holbrook, for appellant.

John L Sullivan, Atty. Gen., Perry M. Ling and Gen. William P. Mahoney, Jr., Asst. Attys.Gen., and William W. Stevenson, Co. Atty., of Flagstaff, for appellee.

Udall, Justice.Stanford, C. J., and La Prade, J., concur.

OPINION

Udall, Justice.

The defendant(appellant) was charged by information filed in the Superior Court of Coconino County with three counts of murder and one count of assault with intent to commit murder.All alleged offenses occurred within a brief space of time at approximately 2 A.M. on May 16, 1946, in front of defendant's home in Bellemont, Arizona.A five day jury trial (September 3-7, 1946) resulted in the conviction of defendant on count I for murder in the second degree of LeRoy Blevins, and on count III for the manslaughter of Henry Blevins.Verdicts of acquittal were rendered on count II charging the murder of Ernest Blevins, and on count IV charging an assault with intent to murder Oscar Blevins.From the judgments of conviction wherein defendant was sentenced to serve 12 to 15 years on the second degree murder charge and, running concurrently, 3 to 6 years on the manslaughter charge, and from the court's denial of his motions for a new trial and in arrest of judgment, this appeal was taken.

The facts developed at the trial were these: DefendantHenry Singleton was a resident of Bellemont, Arizona, a settlement some twelve miles west of Flagstaff and adjacent to the Navajo Ordnance Depot.For the past four years and at this time he was employed at that Depot as a guard by the United States Government.His hours of work on the day in question were from 3:30 P.M. to 11:30 P.M.

His home consisted of a living room, two bedrooms and a kitchen together with a small cabin located approximately thirty feet south of the main residence.There were but two usable entrances or doorways into the home, the principle one being a north door leading to the bedroom where defendant slept, and, on the east, a kitchen entrance consisting of an outer screen door, a small entry way and a wooden door into the kitchen proper.The occupants of the home on the night in question were the defendant, his wife, a twelve year old adopted daughter, Leonard Gore(defendant's grown stepson), and Ella Blevins(the estranged wife of Ernest Blevins who had lived with the Singletons since March 1, 1946).

On the evening of May 15, 1946, Ernest Blevins together with his brothersOscar Blevins and Henry Blevins, a cousin, LeRoy Blevins, and the latter's friend, one Harvey Smith, were in attendance at a dance at the Bellemont Inn, a tavern on U. S. Highway 66, some 500 to 600 feet north of defendant's home.These men, but for the exceptions hereafter noted, spent the evening at said tavern and an adjacent cabin dancing, drinking and talking with friends until closing time at about 1:00 A.M. Thereupon the five of them accompanied by one Dorothy Etheridge drove west on Highway 66 some three and one-half miles to Jensen's Barbecue stand where sandwiches and coffee were obtained and consumed.They then returned to Bellemont where they turned off the highway and proceeded to defendant's home, stopping their car within 6 to 8 feet of the north bedroom door.No reasonable explanation was given by any of the car's occupants as to the purpose of this visit to defendant's home in the dead of night.But judging by their two verdicts of acquittal, it seems the jury believed this nocturnal excursion to be other than a legitimate and peaceful mission.

Defendant's wife and other occupants of the Singleton home testified that near the hour of 10:00 P.M. Ernest Blevins had appeared at the north living room door where he made inquiry of Mrs. Singleton as to whether everyone was in bed, and to her affirmative reply answered, "That's a God-damn lie."He made no other disturbance at that time and departed.About one hour later Ernest appeared again, this time at the kitchen door and accompanied by another man identified by a neighbor lady as LeRoy Blevins.When Mrs. Singleton refused to let him in, he made considerable disturbance, banging and shaking the latched kitchen screen door, and becoming quite abusive towards her.He told her that what he wanted to do was "to get those two sons-of-bitches together and kill them."His parting statement was "very well, I know you won't open the door, but I will be back with authority to come in."Both men appeared to have been drinking and seemed in a highly belligerent mood.When defendant, with his neighbor and fellow guard, Mr. Richards, returned home from work about midnight, his wife highly upset, related to him in detail the happenings of the evening.He attempted to quiet her fears and "told her to go on to bed, they was just drunk, it was drunk talk" whereupon they all retired.Upon the facts thus far there is virtually no disagreement except that the State offered in rebuttal the negative testimony of others from the Bellemont Inn Tavern to the effect that they did not remember any of the Blevins men leaving the dance at any time during the evening.

As to the homicides, it is the State's version that when the Blevins' car stopped in front of defendant's home, Ernest Blevins started to get out of the left rear door when, without warning or provocation, the defendant fired at him from the north bedroom door and, thereafter, in rapid succession fired four or five more shots hitting the deceased persons and Oscar Blevins as quickly as they could climb out of the car.The state contends that Ernest was the first and Oscar the last man shot, while the defense contends the reverse to be true.

The defendant's story is, however, that he was awakened at approximately 2 A.M. by a disturbance at the kitchen door which sounded like the noise of a screen being torn.Without rousing the other members of the family or stopping to dress, he picked up his loaded shot gun and opened the north door to his bedroom at which instant he was confronted immediately by two men standing in the bright moonlight.One, standing directly in front of the car he recognized as Oscar Blevins while the identity of the other, standing in back of the car, he was unable to distinguish.In response to defendant's query "what is this, what are you trying to do?" both men started toward him saying that they were coming in.He told Oscar to stop, and when he continued to advance and made a movement towards his hip, defendant fired, first at Oscar and then at the other man who was coming towards him, and who then turned and disappeared behind the house.Defendant testifies that thereupon: "I kind of stepped out on the front of my door, and three men come from behind the house, and a woman, and just as the men got right out between the cars they said, 'There's the damn son-of-bitch, come on.'I told them to stop, and they didn't, and I fired another shot.And there was one guy run off towards the saloon, and I don't know where the other went, and Ernie hesitated, then started on, kept coming.I told him not take no more steps, he taken another, and I fired.He throws up his hands and wheeled around and fell."

After the shooting was over, it having all occurred in a few short minutes, the girl, Dorothy Etheridge, was told to get away from there.She went on foot to the nearby Inn and telephoned the police.Defendant dressed, went to the home of his neighbor Mr. Richards and told him what had happened, stepped out for a moment to telephone the sheriff's office at Flagstaff, and then came back to the Richards' home to await the arrival of the officers to whom he peaceably surrendered some thirty minutes later.In the meantime, the wounded Oscar Blevins had been driven to the hospital in the Blevins car by Harvey Smith.

When Sheriff Francis and Deputy Walker arrived upon the scene they found Henry Blevins lying wounded in the front seat of Singleton's Ford coupe which was parked in the alley to the east of his house.Ernest Blevins, also wounded was found lying on the ground some twenty-one feet northeast of the bedroom door from which the shots were fired.Ambulances were called and the mortally wounded men were removed to the Flagstaff hospital where both died between 7 A.M. and 8 A.M. that same morning and were, before their deaths, apparently unable to give their versions of the shooting.At the coming of daylight, the body of LeRoy Blevins was found dead on the north side of a building some 170 feet northeast of the Singleton house.The officers further discovered that the screen had been partially ripped from defendant's kitchen door, and the door to the small cabin south of the main house had been broken or kicked in.A nearly empty quart bottle of whiskey and an empty beer bottle were found near where the Blevins' car had been parked, and later a full quart of whiskey was found in the car itself.Doctor Kitteridge testified that Henry Blevins died from a gunshot wound of the abdomen, the four shot having entered from the right side and slightly toward the back; and that LeRoy Blevins died from a gunshot wound of the chest, the shot having entered from the back.

There was no evidence of any previous trouble between defendant and the Blevins men, and, while he knew both Oscar and Ernest, it appears that he was unacquainted with either Henry or LeRoy both of whom he was convicted of killing.The gun had been purchased by defend...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
77 cases
  • State v. Owen
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • January 27, 1953
    ...It does not seem possible that the jury could have been misled to the conclusion that malice might be dispensed with. State v. Singleton, 66 Ariz. 49, 182 P.2d 920. By assignments Nos. 29, 30 and 31, the appellants contend that the jury and the court abused their respective discretions in i......
  • State v. Payne
    • United States
    • Arizona Supreme Court
    • November 21, 2013
  • State v. Escobedo
    • United States
    • Arizona Court of Appeals
    • August 11, 2009
    ...pointed out not been committed, is there reasonable probability that the verdict might have been different? State v. Singleton, 66 Ariz. 49, 66, 182 P.2d 920, 930-31 (1947). Consistent with Singleton, there is a significant body of cases from the Arizona Supreme Court leading to the conclus......
  • State v. Payne
    • United States
    • Arizona Supreme Court
    • August 21, 2013
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT