State v. Smith
| Decision Date | 20 June 1890 |
| Citation | State v. Smith, 14 S.W. 108, 101 Mo. 174 (Mo. 1890) |
| Parties | STATE ex rel. TEASDALE v. SMITH et al., Judges. |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Johnson & Lucas and T. A. Frank-Jones, for relator.
This is an application for a writ of certiorari, directed to the judges of the Kansas City court of appeals. This writ, under constitutional provisions, is strictly the common-law writ of that name. It only brings up the record, and can only reach errors or defects which appear on the face of the record of the tribunal to which it is issued, and which are jurisdictional in their...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
47 cases
-
State v. Shelton
...go to the jurisdiction of the tribunal to which the writ is sued out, can be reviewed by such writ." By Sherwood, J., in State v. Smith, 101 Mo. 174, 14 S. W. 108: "This writ, under constitutional provisions, is strictly the common-law writ of that name. It only brings up the record, and ca......
-
State ex rel. Aquamsi Land Co. v. Hostetter
... ... questioned in this collateral proceeding. Mo. Const. 1820, ... Sec. 1, Art. V; Laws 1851, p. 201; R. S. 1929, secs ... 14500-14539; State ex rel. Allen v. Trimble, 317 Mo ... 751, 297 S.W. 378; State ex rel. Bentley v ... Reynolds, 89 S.W. 877, 190 Mo. 578; State ex rel ... Smith v. Dykeman, 134 S.W. 120, 153 Mo.App. 416; ... State ex rel. Ruppel v. Wiethaupt, 162 S.W. 163, 254 ... Mo. 319; 15 C. J., pp. 874-875; State ex rel. v ... Bailey, 118 N.W. 676, 19 L. R. A. (N. S.) 775; Burt ... v. Railroad Co., 31 Minn. 472, 18 N.W. 285; Kayser ... v. Bremen, 16 Mo ... ...
-
The State ex rel. Kansas & Texas Coal Railway v. Shelton
...no appeal or writ of error is allowed, such as the removal of an officer, habeas corpus, and similar special jurisdiction. State ex rel. v. Smith, 101 Mo. 174; State ex rel. v. Edwards, 104 Mo. 125; State rel. v. Slover, 113 Mo. 210; State ex rel. v. Dobson, 135 Mo. 1; State ex rel. v. Gill......
-
State ex rel. Gilman v. Robertson
... ... C. G. GILMAN et al. v. W. R. ROBERTSON et al., Judges of Springfield Court of Appeals Supreme Court of Missouri April 2, 1915 ... Writ ... M. R ... Lively for relators ... (1) ... Certiorari is proper procedure. State v. Smith, 176 ... Mo. 90; State ex rel. v. Edwards, 104 Mo. 125; ... State ex rel. v. Shelton, 154 Mo. 670; State ex ... rel. v. Guinnotte, 156 Mo. 513; State ex rel. v ... Broaddus, 238 Mo. 189; Curtis v. Sexton, 252 ... Mo. 221. The petition is sufficient in all of its ... allegations ... ...
Get Started for Free