State v. So Ho Me
| Court | United States State Supreme Court of Washington |
| Writing for the Court | SCOTT, J. |
| Citation | 1 Wash. 276,24 P. 443 |
| Decision Date | 31 May 1890 |
| Parties | STATE v. SO HO ME. |
24 P. 443
1 Wash. 276
STATE
v.
SO HO ME.
Supreme Court of Washington
May 31, 1890
Appeal from superior court, Walla Walla county.
Wellington M. Clark, for appellant.
L. H. Plattor, for the State.
SCOTT, J.
This case is in the same condition as State v. So Ho Ge, ante, 442, (just decided.) The order sustaining the motion in arrest of judgment is reversed, and the court below is directed to sentence the defendant for manslaughter.
STILES, J., concurs. HOYT, J., concurs in the result.
To continue reading
Request your trial
1 practice notes
-
State v. So Ho Ge
...2 Wash. T. 381, 7 P. 872, the court decided that it was necessary to allege a purpose to kill in order to sustain a conviction for murder [1 Wash. 276] under our statutes. We have followed that case in Blanton v. State, ante, 439, (just decided.) The indictment in this case is sufficient to......
1 cases
-
State v. So Ho Ge
...2 Wash. T. 381, 7 P. 872, the court decided that it was necessary to allege a purpose to kill in order to sustain a conviction for murder [1 Wash. 276] under our statutes. We have followed that case in Blanton v. State, ante, 439, (just decided.) The indictment in this case is sufficient to......