State v. Sosebee
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | DEEN |
| Citation | State v. Sosebee, 382 S.E.2d 681, 191 Ga.App. 725 (Ga. App. 1989) |
| Decision Date | 16 May 1989 |
| Docket Number | No. A89A0262,A89A0262 |
| Parties | The STATE v. SOSEBEE. |
C. Andrew Fuller, Dist. Atty., Daniel A. Summer, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellant.
Eddie Benton, Jr., for appellee.
In the instant case appellee Sosebee was indicted and tried on a charge of theft by deception, the indictment alleging that Sosebee unlawfully obtained $8,000 from the sale of a boat without disclosing the existence of a known valid lien on the property. A Hall County jury found him guilty as charged, and he was sentenced to ten years' confinement and ordered to make restitution in the amount of $500.
The State appeals, alleging that it was error to require restitution of only $500 (the minimum amount required to sustain a conviction) when the indictment averred a theft of $8,000. The State bases its appeal on OCGA § 5-7-1(2), contending that the trial court's order is one which arrests the judgment of conviction on legal grounds, as specified in subsection (2). The State further alleges that the sentence was void and therefore directly appealable.
OCGA § 5-7-1 states the only grounds on which the State may properly appeal in a criminal case, and the statute is construed strictly against the State. State v. Clendinin, 136 Ga.App. 303, 221 S.E.2d 71 (1975). See also, e.g., State v. Eaves, 185 Ga.App. 740, 365 S.E.2d 535 (1988); State v. Bryant, 182 Ga.App. 698, 356 S.E.2d 656 (1987); State v. Asinoff, 173 Ga.App. 573, 327 S.E.2d 237 (1985). We find that the order appealed from does not represent any of the statutorily enumerated instances in which the State has the right to appeal. See, e.g., State v. Gribble, 169 Ga.App. 446, 313 S.E.2d 720 (1984). We find, moreover, that the sentence below is not void. See State v. O'Neal, 156 Ga.App. 384, 274 S.E.2d 575 (1980); cf. State v. Johnson, 183 Ga.App. 236, 358 S.E.2d 840 (1987); State v. Shuman, 161 Ga.App. 304, 287 S.E.2d 757 (1982). The appeal must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Appeal dismissed.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Gibbins v. State
...to appeal, and we find that the sentence is not void. Therefore, the appeal must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. State v. Sosebee, 191 Ga.App. 725, 382 S.E.2d 681. Although there may be merit to allowing appellate courts to correct potential errors in sentencing, the grounds on which......
-
State v. Conry
...by statute and Fla. Stat. § 924.07(1)(k) provides State with right to appeal order denying restitution); State v. Sosebee , 191 Ga.App. 725, 382 S.E.2d 681, 681-82 (1989) (statute providing grounds for State appeals in criminal cases must be strictly construed against the State and did not ......
-
State v. Petty
...from does not represent any of the statutorily enumerated instances in which the State has the right to appeal." State v. Sosebee , 191 Ga. App. 725, 382 S.E.2d 681 (1989). And, because the State's appeal is not authorized by OCGA § 5-7-1 (a) (4) or OCGA § 5-7-1 (a) (5), we lack jurisdictio......
-
Travers v. Jones: Is "fact Preclusion" a Death Knell for Section 1983 Employment Claims Against Local Governments by Civil Service Employees?
...679-80. 243. 194 S.E.2d 437 (Ga. 1972). 244. Hunter, 382 S.E.2d at 680. 245. Id. at 681. 246. 313 S.E.2d 100 (Ga. 1984). 247. Hunter, 382 S.E.2d at 681. 248. 384 S.E.2d 648 (Ga. 1989). 654 GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW [Vol. 21:627 and damages relating to enforcement of an ordinance p......