State v. Soto

Docket Number109374
Decision Date15 May 2015

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
17 cases
  • State v. Hillard
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • 10 Junio 2022
    ...specific intent of premeditation to secure a conviction. See K.S.A. 2020 Supp. 21-5210 ; Morris , 311 Kan. at 490, 463 P.3d 417 ; State v. Soto , 301 Kan. 969, Syl. ¶ 1, 349 P.3d 1256 (2015). Hillard mainly argues the State did not present sufficient evidence that he killed Goodpaster with ......
  • State v. Mattox
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • 10 Marzo 2017
    ...instruction would have made a difference in the verdict.’ " State v. Cooper , 303 Kan. 764, 769–70, 366 P.3d 232 (2016) (quoting State v. Soto , 301 Kan. 969, Syl. ¶ 1, 349 P.3d 1256 [2015] ).The State correctly points out that we have consistently rejected Mattox's argument. Most recently ......
  • State v. Showalter
    • United States
    • Kansas Court of Appeals
    • 16 Diciembre 2022
    ...the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination have relied on its Longobardi holding. Our Supreme Court's 2011 Bailey decision, 2015 Soto decision— State v. Soto , 301 Kan. 969, 349 P.3d 1256 (2015) —and 2020 George decision all cite Longobardi for the proposition that " ‘[t]he pr......
  • State v. Aguirre
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • 15 Mayo 2015
  • Get Started for Free