State v. Stallings

Decision Date10 January 1905
Citation38 So. 261,142 Ala. 112
PartiesSTATE v. STALLINGS.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Appeal from Chancery Court, Butler County; W. L. Parks, Chancellor.

Dan alias Daniel Stallings was indicted for murder in the first degree, and from a decree allowing him bail the state appeals. Affirmed.

The petition in habeas corpus was as follows: "Your petitioner, J. F. Stallings, most respectfully represents unto your honor that Dan alias Daniel Stallings, in whose behalf this application or petition is made, is illegally imprisoned and restrained of his liberty and held under guard in the Elk Hotel, in the city of Greenville, Alabama, by one J. H. Hartley, who is the sheriff in and for said county and state, by virtue of a warrant charging said Dan alias Daniel Stallings with murder in the first degree, said warrant issued by I. Y. Trawick, clerk of the circuit court in said county of Butler and state of Alabama, a copy of which said warrant is hereto attached, and marked 'Exhibit A,' and made a part of this petition, and with leave of reference thereto as often as may be necessary. And petitioner alleges that the said Dan alias Daniel Stallings was indicted by the grand jury of said county at the October term, 1904, a copy of which indictment is hereto attached, marked 'Exhibit B,' and made a part hereof, for the offense of murder in the first degree, and no bond has been set by any court, or application made therefor. And your petitioner further avers that the proof is not evident, or the presumption great, that the said Dan alias Daniel Stallings is guilty of a capital offense. Wherefore your petitioner prays for a writ of habeas corpus directed to the said J. H. Hartley, sheriff of Butler county, Alabama, commanding him to bring the body of the said Dan alias Daniel Stallings before your honor at a day and place to be by your honor appointed, together with the cause of detention of the said Dan alias Daniel Stallings." On the trial, under the writ which was issued by the court, the evidence showed that the defendant shot and killed Radford Buckhaults on or about October 1, 1904, at Greenville, Ala and was at the same time himself wounded, being shot in the left side. The evidence for the defense showed that the deceased was in a bar room on the evening of the killing, and when the defendant walked in the deceased insulted him; that defendant said nothing, but soon left, and about 7 o'clock was passing up the sidewalk, and the deceased was sitting in a buggy near the sidewalk, and cursed the defendant again, applying an opprobrious epithet to him. The defendant thereupon...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • State v. Hargraves
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • November 6, 1940
    ... ... closely related as to form a part of the res gestae ... ( State v. Taylor, 7 Idaho 134, 61 P. 288; People ... v. Ah Choy, 1 Idaho 317; 8 R. C. L. 192, sec. 188; vol ... 1, Wharton's Crim. Ev. 494; People v. Lane, 100 ... Cal. 379, 34 P. 856; State v. Stallings, 142 Ala ... 112, 38 So. 261; Cole v. State, 125 Ga. 276, 53 S.E. 958.) ... Evidence ... of flight by the defendant who admits that the fatal bullet ... came from his gun is useless; and can only be resorted to for ... the purpose of determining who did the act and cannot be ... ...
  • Roan v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • June 9, 1932
    ... ... "had laid it on the table," was weak, it is true, ... but of some evidentiary value as a part of the res gestæ in ... illustrating the character of the main fact and in tending to ... intimidate the witnesses present. State v ... Stallings, 142 Ala. 112, 38 So. 261; Laws v ... State, 209 Ala. 174, 95 So. 819; Dudley v ... State, 185 Ala. 27, 64 So. 309 ... There ... was no error of which defendant can complain, in allowing the ... witness Sells to tell the statement or invitation by ... defendant to deceased to go ... ...
  • Brown v. State, 6 Div. 238
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • June 18, 1946
    ... ... Ala.App. 104] the defendant had returned to the house, the ... 'Holland told him he was going after a gun and was coming ... back to kill him, and that he could not defend himself.' ... This was all hearsay evidence and was not a part of the res ... gestae. State v. Stallings, 142 Ala. [112], 115, 38 ... So. 261; Fonville v. State, 91 Ala. 39, 8 So. 688 ... The trial court likewise erred in permitting Mrs. Taylor to ... testify that deceased said, 'Holland did not want him on ... account of the warrant, but for some other reason.'' ... See ... also, ... ...
  • State v. Kump
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • September 25, 1956
    ...back to kill him, and that he could not defend himself.' This was all hearsay evidence and was not a part of the gestae. State v. Stallings, 142 Ala. 115, 38 So. 261; Fonville v. State, 91 Ala. 39, 8 So. In the case of Fitch v. Commonwealth, 267 Ky. 646, 103 S.W.2d 98, a statement by the de......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT