State v. Stevens
| Decision Date | 23 November 2004 |
| Citation | State v. Stevens, 272 Conn. 902, 863 A.2d 695 (Conn. 2004) |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
| Parties | STATE of Connecticut v. Linda M. STEVENS. |
Margaret Gaffney Radionovas, senior assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.Jane E. Carroll, special public defender, in opposition.
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 85 Conn.App. 473, 857 A.2d 972(2004), is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the trial court's judgment sentencing the defendant to seven years?"
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17320.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
3 cases
-
State v. Rosado
... ... we look to those principles in order to dispose of the ... disputed condition properly. A court may, where possible, sever the illegal portion of the agreement and enforce the remainder." (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Stevens, 85 Conn.App. 473, 479, 857 A.2d 972, cert. granted on other grounds, 272 Conn. 902, 863 A.2d 695 (2004) ... In the present case, the plea agreement was articulated orally by the court during the June 26, 2003 hearing. An examination of the transcript reveals that although the ... ...
-
Royster v. Commissioner of Correction
... ... [Strickland v. Washington, ... supra, 466 U.S. 692.] This occurs when (1) the defendant ... is denied counsel at a critical state; (2) counsel entirely ... fails to subject the prosecution’s case to meaningful ... adversarial testing; or (3) counsel is called upon ... agreement." State v. Rosado, 92 Conn.App. 823, 825 n.3, ... 887 A.2d 917 (2006); State v. Stevens, 85 Conn.App ... 473, 474 n.2, 857 A.2d 972, cert. granted on other grounds, ... 272 Conn ... 902, 863 A.2d 695 (2004). The source of ... ...
- Madsen v. Gates