State v. Stovall
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | Davis, J |
| Citation | State v. Stovall, 103 N.C. 416, 8 S.E. 900 (N.C. 1889) |
| Decision Date | 25 February 1889 |
| Parties | State v. Stovall. |
An act incorporating an agricultural society, which provides that it shall be unlawful for any person to sell, or offer for sale, any liquors, tobacco, or other refreshments within one-half mile of the grounds of said society during the week of their annual fair, except persons doing regular business within the prohibited territory, is not unconstitutional as conferring any special rights or privileges, nor does it create a monopoly, or take away vested rights.
Agricultural societies are of a public character and benefit, and the legislature has power to enact such laws and provide for such regulations as will preserve the good order and promote the interests and comfort of those who assemble, either for pleasure or for the advancement of agricultural interests.
W. E. Daniel, for appellant. The Attorney General, for the State.
Davis, J. Indictment for selling liquor, tobacco, etc., within one-half mile of the fair grounds of Roanoke & Tar River Agricultural Society, contrary to law, tried before Graves, J., at spring term, 1888, of the superior court of Halifax county. The jury rendered the following special verdict: " By chapter 88, Priv. Laws 1870-71, the Roanoke & Tar River Agricultural Society was duly incorporated. This act of incorporation was amended by chapter 33, Priv. Laws 1887, limiting the capital stock of the company to $5,000, to be divided in such number of shares as the incorporators might determine, and by chapter 39, Pub. Laws 1887, by adding the following section: " Copies of the several acts referred to are annexed and made part of the verdict, but it is not necessary here to set them out more fully than above. "Upon said verdict the court adjudged the said James...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Town of Green River v. Bunger
...v. Read, 12 R.I. 137; Meyers v. Baker, 120 Ill. 567, 12 N.E. 79; State v. Cate, 58 N.H. 240; Com. v. Bearse, 132 Mass. 542; State v. Stovall, 103 N.C. 416, 8 S.E. 900. ordinance making it unlawful to solicit custom or patronage upon any boat, or in any depot, for any hotel or for the transp......
-
State v. Warren
...of the police power and not in violation of article 1, § 7, if it bears alike on all persons in a defined locality," citing State v. Stovall, 103 N.C. 416, 8 S.E. 900, and State v. Moore, supra. There have been some decisions of this court apparently stating a contrary view, but the opinion......
-
State v. Dixon
...the cases of an earlier period dealing with the regulation of intoxicating liquors, such as State v. Joyner, 81 N.C. 534; State v. Stovall, 103 N.C. 416, 8 S.E. 900; State v. Barringer, 110 N.C. 525, 14 S.E. State v. Snow, 117 N.C. 778, 23 S.E. 323; Guy v. Commissioners, 122 N.C. 471 29 S.E......
-
State v. Felton
...and decisions based thereon, certain earlier decisions, including State v. Muse, 20 N.C. 463; State v. Joyner, 81 N.C. 534; State v. Stovall, 103 N.C. 416, 8 S.E. 900; State v. Moore, 104 N.C. 714, 10 S.E. 143; State v. Barringer, 110 N.C. 525, 14 S.E. 781; State v. Barrett, 138 N.C. 630, 5......
-
ENFORCING A WALL OF SEPARATION BETWEEN BIG BUSINESS AND STATE: PROTECTION FROM MONOPOLIES IN STATE CONSTITUTIONS.
...Inc. v. Stein, 922 F.3d 198, 211 (4th Cir. 2019). (111) State v. Perry, 65 S.E. 915, 917 (N.C. 1909). (112) Id. (113) State v. Stovall, 8 S.E. 900, 900 (N.C. (114) Id. at 901. (115) See also Tobacco Growers' Co-op. Ass'n v. Jones, 117 S.E. 174, 177-78 (N.C. 1923) ("[S]tipulations in partial......