State v. Studd

Decision Date04 March 1998
Citation954 P.2d 276,134 Wn.2d 1010
PartiesState v. Keith Bennett Studd; State v. Lee Earnest Cook, Jr.; State v. Daun Bennett; State v. Raymond McLoyd; State v. William Henry Ameline; State v. Vincent Fields NOS. 65943-5, 65995-8, 65948-6, 65999-1, 65956-7, 66108-1
CourtWashington Supreme Court

Petition For Review: Granted; Granted in part.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • State v. Studd
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • 1 Abril 1999
    ...accurately state the law of self-defense. State v. Studd, 87 Wash.App. 385, 389, 942 P.2d 985 (1997), review granted, 134 Wash.2d 1010, 954 P.2d 276 (1998). The State sought review, arguing that under the "invited error" doctrine Studd cannot complain about an instruction that he proposed. ......
  • State v. Hutchinson
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • 16 Septiembre 1998
  • STATE OF WASHINGTON v. MONROE, 39928-4-I
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • 12 Abril 1999
    ...instructions as a whole. Hutchinson, 135 Wn.2d at 885, citing State v. McLoyd, 87 Wn. App. 66, 71, 939 P.2d 1255 (1997), review granted, 134 Wn.2d 1010 (1998). We conclude that the sympathy instruction did not impermissibly shift the burden of proof to the defendant or affect the standard o......
  • State v. Corn
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • 6 Abril 1999
    ...not constitute invited error. State v. McLoyd, 87 Wash.App. 66, 70, 939 P.2d 1255 (1997), review granted sub nom., State v. Studd, 134 Wash.2d 1010, 954 P.2d 276 (1998). The record here reveals that Ms. Corn's trial counsel did not propose the incorrect instruction. When presented with the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT