State v. Tatum

Decision Date02 November 1994
CitationState v. Tatum, 886 P.2d 1134, 125 Wn.2d 1002 (Wash. 1994)
PartiesState v. Tatum (Venita) NO. 61809-7
CourtWashington Supreme Court

Petition For Review: Denied.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
18 cases
  • Dodge City Saloon, Inc. v. Wash. State Liquor Control Bd.
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • May 15, 2012
    ... ... Eller, 84 Wash.2d at 96, 524 P.2d 242. We will affirm the ALJ's denial of Dodge City's motion unless Dodge City can show that it was prejudiced or the result of the proceedings would have likely been different had the continuance been granted. State v. Tatum, 74 Wash.App. 81, 86, 871 P.2d 1123 (citing Eller, 84 Wash.2d at 95–96, 524 P.2d 242), review denied, 125 Wash.2d 1002, 886 P.2d 1134 (1994).         [168 Wash.App. 404]¶ 27 Here, Dodge City claimed that it could not proceed without testimony from its “most important witness.” Br ... ...
  • Dodge City Saloon, Inc. v. Washington State Liquor Control Bd.
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • February 28, 2012
    ... ... Eller, 84 Wash.2d at 96, 524 P.2d 242. We will affirm the ALJ's denial of Dodge City's motion unless Dodge City can show that it was prejudiced or the result of the proceedings would have likely been different had the continuance been granted. State v. Tatum, 74 Wash.App. 81, 86, 871 P.2d 1123 (citing Eller, 84 Wash.2d at 95–96, 524 P.2d 242), review denied, 125 Wash.2d 1002, 886 P.2d 1134 (1994).         ¶ 23 Here, Dodge City claimed that it could not proceed without testimony from its “most important witness.” Br. of Appellant at 38 ... ...
  • Firestorm 1991, Matter of
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • May 16, 1996
    ... ... See State v. Tatum, 74 Wash.App. 81, 86, 871 P.2d 1123, review denied, 125 Wash.2d 1002, 886 P.2d 1134 (1994). When a trial court fails to make any factual ... ...
  • State v. Clark, No. 35216-8-II (Wash. App. 12/24/2007)
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • December 24, 2007
    ... ... A. Standard of Review ...         We review de novo a trial court's application of a court rule to a set of facts. State v. Carlyle, 84 Wn. App. 33, 35-36, 925 P.2d 635 (1996) (citing State v. Tatum, 74 Wn. App. 81, 86, 871 P.2d 1123, review denied, 125 Wn.2d 1002, 886 P.2d 1134 (1994)) ...         A defendant seeking dismissal for non-compliance with CrR 3.3 must prove more than a misapplication of the court rules; he must show violation of a constitutional right. CrR 3.3(a)(4). In ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Civil Procedure Deskbook (WSBA) Table of Cases
    • Invalid date
    ...sub nom. Swan v. Washington, 498 U.S. 1046 (1991): 59.6(5), 60.6(3)(c) State v. Tatum, 74 Wn.App. 81, 871 P.2d 1123, review denied, 125 Wn.2d 1002 (1994): 45.6(1)(a), 45.7(1) State v. Taylor, 39 Wn.2d 751, 238 P.2d 1189 (1951): 40.6(3) State v. Tharp, 42 Wn.2d 494, 256 P.2d 482 (1953): 47.6......
  • §45.7 Significant Authorities
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Civil Procedure Deskbook (WSBA) Chapter 45 Rule 45.Subpoena
    • Invalid date
    ...to appear until discharged by the court or the summoning party. State v. Tatum, 74 Wn.App. 81, 85,871 P.2d 1123, review denied, 125 Wn.2d 1002 (1994). The failure to serve a subpoena in conformity with the rules "renders such service a nullity." State v. Adamski, 111 Wn.2d 574, 578, 761 P.2......
  • §45.6 Analysis
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Civil Procedure Deskbook (WSBA) Chapter 45 Rule 45.Subpoena
    • Invalid date
    ...regardless of how many times the witness is required to appear. State v. Tatum, 74 Wn.App. 81, 85, 871 P.2d 1123, review denied, 125 Wn.2d 1002 (1994). The witness has a continuing duty to appear until the court or the summoning party has discharged the witness. Id. The continuance of the t......