State v. Taylor

Decision Date16 July 1921
Docket Number4833
Citation183 N.W. 998,44 S.D. 332
PartiesSTATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA, Plaintiff and respondent, v. ARTHUR O. TAYLOR, Defendant and appellant.
CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court

ARTHUR O. TAYLOR, Defendant and appellant. South Dakota Supreme Court Appeal from Circuit Court, Hamlin County, SD Hon. William N. Skinner, Judge #4833--Affirmed John N. Weber, George H. Marquis Attorneys for Appellant. Byron S. Payne, Attorney General Edwin R. Winans, Assistant Attorney General H. A. Lindstrom, State's Attorney Attorneys for Respondent. Opinion filed July 16, 1921; Rehearing denied October 19, 1921

SMITH, J.

Appeal from a judgment of conviction and an order overruling defendant's motion for a new trial. The assignments of error based upon an order of the trial court overruling a demurrer to the information and an order overruling a motion for a new trial based upon the insufficiency of stipulated evidence to sustain a conviction, present but a single question: Does the information describe a public offense?

The information charges that the defendant

"... did commit the crime of obtaining money under false preensest as follows, to wit: That on or about said 24th day of September, 1920, ... said defendant did willfully, knowingly, unlawfully, and feloniously obtain from one C. R. Horswill ... the sum of $25 in lawful money of the United States, by executing and delivering to said C. R. Horswill a check as follows:

"'Hudson, Wis., 9-24, 1920.

"'Cosmopolitan State Bank: Pay to Self or order $25.00 twenty-five dollars.

"'Arthur O. Taylor.'

and by falsely pretending thereby that there was a bank in the city of Hudson, Wis., by the name of Cosmopolitan State Bank, and that he, said Arthur O. Taylor, had sufficient money on deposit subject to check in such bank, to meet the demand of the check above set forth when same should be presented for payment; that in truth and in fact there was no bank in the city of Hudson, Wis., on or about said 24th day of September, 1920, by the name of Cosmopolitan State Bank; that the check above set forth and mentioned was indorsed as follows: Arthur O. Taylor being written on the back thereof, against the form of the statute, ..."

Some doubt is expressed by appellant's counsel as to whether the information may not have been framed under section 4253, Rev. Code 1919, as amended by chapter 133, Laws 1919, but it is perfectly clear that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a crime under that section. The only question is whether it states facts sufficient to constitute a crime under section 4249, Code 1919, which declares that

"Every person who designedly, by color or aid of any false token or writing, or other false pretense, obtains the signature of any person to any written instrument, or obtains from any person any money or property, is punishable, ..."

It will be observed that the information does not charge that accused, by verbal representations did falsely state that there was a bank by the name of Cosmopolitan State Bank, or that he had sufficient money on deposit subject to check in such bank to meet the same when it should be presented for payment. The allegation is that the defendant did willfully, knowingly, unlawfully, and feloniously obtain the money by executing and delivering a check, thereby falsely pretending that there was a bank, etc. The substance of the information is that the accused willfully, knowingly, unlawfully, and feloniously, did obtain money by means of a check on a...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT